Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29221214›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Prognostic value of MICA/B in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yijing Zhao, Naifei Chen, Yu Yu, Lili Zhou, Chao Niu, Yudi Liu, Huimin Tian, Zheng Lv, Fujun Han, Jiuwei Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances inFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel and potent MICA/B antibody is therapeutically effective inJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Associations between MICA and MICB Genetic Variants, Protein Levels, and Colorectal Cancer: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC).Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Suppression of CD56Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yijing ZhaoCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Naifei ChenCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Yu YuCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Lili ZhouCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Chao NiuCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Yudi LiuCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Huimin TianCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Zheng LvCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Fujun HanCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Jiuwei CuiCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMHC class I chain related-proteins A (MICA) and B (MICB) are natural killer group 2D ligands that mediate tumor surveillance. Several studies have suggested that MICA/B levels predict clinical outcomes in patients with cancer; however, this remains contentious. Here, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of available studies of the prognostic value of MICA/B in cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library to identify studies published from inception to July 2017 that assessed MICA/B in patients with cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of MICA/B were extracted for overall survival (OS) analysis.

resultsA total of 19 studies comprising 2,588 patients with 10 different types of cancer were included in the study. Low sMICA/B levels were found associated with significantly longer OS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.42-1.92],

conclusionsSerum soluble MICA/B represents a potential prognostic marker in various human cancers. High cell-surface MICA/B expression in cancers of the digestive system was found associated with increased survival.

Indexed as

cancermeta-analysisMICAMICBprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29221214
PMCPMC5707108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.