Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29221181›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Analysis of CTCL cell lines reveals important differences between mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome

Elena Netchiporouk, Jennifer Gantchev, Matthew Tsang, Philippe Thibault, Andrew K Watters, John-Douglas Matthew Hughes, Feras M Ghazawi, Anders Woetmann, Niels Ødum, Denis Sasseville and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The HIV-1Viruses · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. "Next top" mouse models advancing CTCL research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. NewCells · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena Netchiporouk *Division of Dermatology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jennifer Gantchev *Division of Dermatology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Matthew TsangDivision of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Philippe ThibaultUniversité de Sherbrooke Rnomics Platform, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Andrew K WattersDepartment of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
John-Douglas Matthew HughesDivision of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Feras M GhazawiDivision of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anders WoetmannDepartment of International Health, Immunology, and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels ØdumDepartment of International Health, Immunology, and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Denis SassevilleDivision of Dermatology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Ivan V LitvinovDivision of Dermatology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
McGill University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cutaneous T-cell lymphomasgene expression analysishuman T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1spectral karyotypingxenograft tumors

Identifiers

PMID29221181
PMCPMC5707075
OpenAlexW2762411371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.