Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29220554›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2017

Assessment of dietary sodium intake using a food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour urinary sodium excretion: a systematic literature review.

Rachael M McLean, Victoria L Farmer, Alice Nettleton, Claire M Cameron, Nancy R Cook, Norman R C Campbell, TRUE Consortium (International Consortium for Quality Research on Dietary Sodium/Salt)

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachael M McLeanDepartment of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-328X
Victoria L FarmerDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Alice NettletonDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Claire M CameronDepartment of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Nancy R CookDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Norman R C CampbellLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1093-4742
TRUE Consortium (International Consortium for Quality Research on Dietary Sodium/Salt)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are often used to assess dietary sodium intake, although 24-hour urinary excretion is the most accurate measure of intake. The authors conducted a systematic review to investigate whether FFQs are a reliable and valid way of measuring usual dietary sodium intake. Results from 18 studies are described in this review, including 16 validation studies. The methods of study design and analysis varied widely with respect to FFQ instrument, number of 24-hour urine collections collected per participant, methods used to assess completeness of urine collections, and statistical analysis. Overall, there was poor agreement between estimates from FFQ and 24-hour urine. The authors suggest a framework for validation and reporting based on a consensus statement (2004), and recommend that all FFQs used to estimate dietary sodium intake undergo validation against multiple 24-hour urine collections.

Indexed as

HumansHypertensionNutrition SurveysReproducibility of ResultsSodium, DietaryUrine Specimen CollectionSodium, Dietarydiet surveyssodium dietaryurine specimen collection

Identifiers

PMID29220554
PMCPMC8030845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.