Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29220525›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2018

Impact of Opioid Dose Reduction and Risk Mitigation Initiatives on Chronic Opioid Therapy Patients at Higher Risk for Opioid-Related Adverse Outcomes.

Manu Thakral, Rod L Walker, Kathleen Saunders, Susan M Shortreed, Sascha Dublin, Michael Parchman, Ryan N Hansen, Evette Ludman, Karen J Sherman, Michael Von Korff

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Health(care) in the Crisis: Reflections in Science and Society on Opioid Addiction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manu ThakralKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Rod L WalkerKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Kathleen SaundersKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Susan M ShortreedKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Sascha DublinKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Michael ParchmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Ryan N HansenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Evette LudmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Karen J ShermanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Michael Von KorffKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute IHS-1306-02198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to determine if opioid risk reduction initiatives including dose reduction and risk mitigation strategies for chronic noncancer pain patients receiving chronic opioid therapy (COT) had a differential impact on average daily opioid doses of COT patients at higher risk for opioid-related adverse outcomes compared with lower-risk patients. Design: Interrupted time series. Setting: Group Health Cooperative (GH), a health care delivery system and insurance within Washington State, between 2006 and 2014. Population: GH enrollees on COT defined as receiving a supply of 70 or more days of opioids within 90 days using electronic pharmacy data for filled prescriptions. Methods: We compared the average daily morphine equivalent doses (MED) of COT patients with and without each of the following higher-risk characteristics: mental disorders, substance use disorders, sedative use, and male gender. Results: In all four pairwise comparisons, the higher-risk subgroup had a higher average daily MED than the lower-risk subgroup across the study period. Adjusted for covariates, modest differences in the annual rate of reduction in average daily MED were noted between higher- and lower-risk subgroups in three pairwise comparisons: those with mental disorders vs without (-8.2 mg/y vs -5.2 mg/y, P = 0.005), with sedative use vs without (-9.2 mg/y vs -5.8 mg/y, P = 0.004); mg), in men vs women (-8.8 mg/y vs -5.9 mg/y, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Using clinical policy initiatives in a health care system, dose reductions were achieved among COT patients at higher risk for opioid-related adverse outcomes that were at least as large as those among lower-risk patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersRiskRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID29220525
PMCPMC6294398
OpenAlexW2771273622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.