Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29220515›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2018

BUSCO Applications from Quality Assessments to Gene Prediction and Phylogenomics.

Robert M Waterhouse, Mathieu Seppey, Felipe A Simão, Mosè Manni, Panagiotis Ioannidis, Guennadi Klioutchnikov, Evgenia V Kriventseva, Evgeny M Zdobnov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,236 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,236citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,236 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adaptive cold-environmental strategies ofHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapidly evolving aphid gall effector proteins exhibit saposin-like folds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Deciphering the genomic landscape ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert M WaterhouseDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mathieu SeppeyDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Felipe A SimãoDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mosè ManniDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Panagiotis IoannidisDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guennadi KlioutchnikovDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Evgenia V KriventsevaDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Evgeny M ZdobnovDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomics promises comprehensive surveying of genomes and metagenomes, but rapidly changing technologies and expanding data volumes make evaluation of completeness a challenging task. Technical sequencing quality metrics can be complemented by quantifying completeness of genomic data sets in terms of the expected gene content of Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO, http://busco.ezlab.org). The latest software release implements a complete refactoring of the code to make it more flexible and extendable to facilitate high-throughput assessments. The original six lineage assessment data sets have been updated with improved species sampling, 34 new subsets have been built for vertebrates, arthropods, fungi, and prokaryotes that greatly enhance resolution, and data sets are now also available for nematodes, protists, and plants. Here, we present BUSCO v3 with example analyses that highlight the wide-ranging utility of BUSCO assessments, which extend beyond quality control of genomics data sets to applications in comparative genomics analyses, gene predictor training, metagenomics, and phylogenomics.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsevolutionmetagenomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29220515
PMCPMC5850278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.