Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29220488›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2018

Disentangling Immediate Adaptive Introgression from Selection on Standing Introgressed Variation in Humans.

Evelyn Jagoda, Daniel J Lawson, Jeffrey D Wall, David Lambert, Craig Muller, Michael Westaway, Matthew Leavesley, Terence D Capellini, Marta Mirazón Lahr, Pascale Gerbault and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The history and evolution of the Denisovan-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Evelyn JagodaHuman Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Daniel J LawsonIntegrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey D WallInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
David LambertAustralian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia.
Craig MullerCenter for GeoGenetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael WestawayAustralian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia.
Matthew LeavesleyDepartment of Anthropology and Sociology, University of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Terence D CapelliniHuman Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Marta Mirazón LahrDepartment of Archaeology, Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Pascale GerbaultResearch Department of Genetics Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark G ThomasResearch Department of Genetics Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrea Bamberg MiglianoUCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Eske WillerslevCenter for GeoGenetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mait MetspaluEstonian Biocentre, Tartu, Estonia.
Luca PaganiEstonian Biocentre, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have reported evidence suggesting that portions of contemporary human genomes introgressed from archaic hominin populations went to high frequencies due to positive selection. However, no study to date has specifically addressed the postintrogression population dynamics of these putative cases of adaptive introgression. Here, for the first time, we specifically define cases of immediate adaptive introgression (iAI) in which archaic haplotypes rose to high frequencies in humans as a result of a selective sweep that occurred shortly after the introgression event. We define these cases as distinct from instances of selection on standing introgressed variation (SI), in which an introgressed haplotype initially segregated neutrally and subsequently underwent positive selection. Using a geographically diverse data set, we report novel cases of selection on introgressed variation in living humans and shortlist among these cases those whose selective sweeps are more consistent with having been the product of iAI rather than SI. Many of these novel inferred iAI haplotypes have potential biological relevance, including three that contain immune-related genes in West Siberians, South Asians, and West Eurasians. Overall, our results suggest that iAI may not represent the full picture of positive selection on archaically introgressed haplotypes in humans and that more work needs to be done to analyze the role of SI in the archaic introgression landscape of living humans.

Indexed as

adaptive introgressionarchaic genomesinterferonNeanderthalpositive selectiontoll-like receptor

Identifiers

PMID29220488
PMCPMC5850494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.