Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29220481›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental entomology2018

Blended Refuge and Insect Resistance Management for Insecticidal Corn.

David W Onstad, Andre L B Crespo, Zaiqi Pan, Philip R Crain, Stephen D Thompson, Clinton D Pilcher, Amit Sethi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental entomology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plant Abandonment byInsects · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David W OnstadDuPont Pioneer, Johnston, IA.
Andre L B CrespoDuPont Pioneer, Johnston, IA.
Zaiqi PanDuPont Pioneer, Johnston, IA.
Philip R CrainDuPont Pioneer, Johnston, IA.
Stephen D ThompsonDuPont Pioneer, Johnston, IA.
Clinton D PilcherDuPont Pioneer, Johnston, IA.
Amit SethiDuPont Pioneer, Johnston, IA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we evaluate the intentional mixing or blending of insecticidal seed with refuge seed for managing resistance by insects to insecticidal corn (Zea mays). We first describe the pest biology and farming practices that will contribute to weighing trade-offs between using block refuges and blended refuges. Case studies are presented to demonstrate how the trade-offs will differ in different systems. We compare biological aspects of several abstract models to guide the reader through the history of modeling, which has played a key role in the promotion or denigration of blending in various scientific debates about insect resistance management for insecticidal crops. We conclude that the use of blended refuge should be considered on a case-by-case basis after evaluation of insect biology, environment, and farmer behavior. For Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, Ostrinia nubilalis, and Helicoverpa zea in the United States, blended refuge provides similar, if not longer, delays in the evolution of resistance compared to separate block refuges.

Indexed as

Insecticide ResistancePest Control, BiologicalAnimalsBacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsColeopteraEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsInsectaInsecticidesMothsPlants, Genetically ModifiedZea maysBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus ThuringiensisInsecticidesBt cornIPMrefugeseed blendseed mixture

Identifiers

PMID29220481
PMCPMC5850660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.