Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29220461›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2017

SFMetaDB: a comprehensive annotation of mouse RNA splicing factor RNA-Seq datasets.

Jin Li, Ching-San Tseng, Antonio Federico, Franjo Ivankovic, Yi-Shuian Huang, Alfredo Ciccodicola, Maurice S Swanson, Peng Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrative functional genomic analysis of intron retention in human and mouse brain with Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jin LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Ching-San TsengInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Antonio FedericoInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics "Adriano Buzzati Traverso", CNR, Naples, Italy.
Franjo IvankovicDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Center for NeuroGenetics and the Genetics Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Yi-Shuian HuangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Alfredo CiccodicolaInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics "Adriano Buzzati Traverso", CNR, Naples, Italy.
Maurice S SwansonDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Center for NeuroGenetics and the Genetics Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Peng YuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWTexas A&M University System · USUniversity of Florida · USInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics · ITParthenope University of Naples · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the number of RNA-Seq datasets deposited publicly has increased over the past few years, incomplete annotation of the associated metadata limits their potential use. Because of the importance of RNA splicing in diseases and biological processes, we constructed a database called SFMetaDB by curating datasets related with RNA splicing factors. Our effort focused on the RNA-Seq datasets in which splicing factors were knocked-down, knocked-out or over-expressed, leading to 75 datasets corresponding to 56 splicing factors. These datasets can be used in differential alternative splicing analysis for the identification of the potential targets of these splicing factors and other functional studies. Surprisingly, only ∼15% of all the splicing factors have been studied by loss- or gain-of-function experiments using RNA-Seq. In particular, splicing factors with domains from a few dominant Pfam domain families have not been studied. This suggests a significant gap that needs to be addressed to fully elucidate the splicing regulatory landscape. Indeed, there are already mouse models available for ∼20 of the unstudied splicing factors, and it can be a fruitful research direction to study these splicing factors in vitro and in vivo using RNA-Seq. Database URL:http://sfmetadb.ece.tamu.edu/

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAnimalsMiceRNA SplicingRNA Splicing FactorsRNA Splicing Factors

Identifiers

PMID29220461
PMCPMC5737203
OpenAlexW2952849455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.