ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2017
Triage by ranking to support the curation of protein interactions.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Large-scale protein-protein post-translational modification extraction with distant supervision and confidence calibrated BioBERT.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Automated assessment of biological database assertions using the scientific literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- ECO, the Evidence & Conclusion Ontology: community standard for evidence information.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- An effective biomedical document classification scheme in support of biocuration: addressing class imbalance.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- An intrinsically disordered proteins community for ELIXIR.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Overview of the BioCreative VI text-mining services for Kinome Curation Track.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Accelerating annotation of articles via automated approaches: evaluation of the neXtA5 curation-support tool by neXtProt.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Database URL: http://candy.hesge.ch/nextA5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.