Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29220354›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Interpreting ambiguous 'trace' results in Schistosoma mansoni CCA Tests: Estimating sensitivity and specificity of ambiguous results with no gold standard.

Michelle N Clements, Christl A Donnelly, Alan Fenwick, Narcis B Kabatereine, Sarah C L Knowles, Aboulaye Meité, Eliézer K N'Goran, Yolisa Nalule, Sarah Nogaro, Anna E Phillips and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reconciling Egg- and Antigen-Based Estimates of Schistosoma mansoni Clearance and Reinfection: A Modeling Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Translating From Egg- to Antigen-Based Indicators forFrontiers in tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michelle N ClementsSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3442-3947
Christl A DonnellyMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alan FenwickSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Narcis B KabatereineSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah C L KnowlesSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Aboulaye MeitéCôte d'Ivoire Ministry of Health, National Program Against Filariasis, Schistosomiasis and Geohelminths, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Eliézer K N'GoranUnité de Formation et de Recherche Biosciences, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abijan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Yolisa NaluleSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah NogaroSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Anna E PhillipsSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Edridah Muheki TukahebwaVector Control Division, Ministry of Health Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Fiona M FlemingSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of new diagnostics is an important tool in the fight against disease. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) is used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of tests in the absence of a gold standard. The main field diagnostic for Schistosoma mansoni infection, Kato-Katz (KK), is not very sensitive at low infection intensities. A point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (CCA) test has been shown to be more sensitive than KK. However, CCA can return an ambiguous 'trace' result between 'positive' and 'negative', and much debate has focused on interpretation of traces results. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE

findingsWe show how LCA can be extended to include ambiguous trace results and analyse S. mansoni studies from both Côte d'Ivoire (CdI) and Uganda. We compare the diagnostic performance of KK and CCA and the observed results by each test to the estimated infection prevalence in the population. Prevalence by KK was higher in CdI (13.4%) than in Uganda (6.1%), but prevalence by CCA was similar between countries, both when trace was assumed to be negative (CCAtn: 11.7% in CdI and 9.7% in Uganda) and positive (CCAtp: 20.1% in CdI and 22.5% in Uganda). The estimated sensitivity of CCA was more consistent between countries than the estimated sensitivity of KK, and estimated infection prevalence did not significantly differ between CdI (20.5%) and Uganda (19.1%). The prevalence by CCA with trace as positive did not differ significantly from estimates of infection prevalence in either country, whereas both KK and CCA with trace as negative significantly underestimated infection prevalence in both countries.

conclusionsIncorporation of ambiguous results into an LCA enables the effect of different treatment thresholds to be directly assessed and is applicable in many fields. Our results showed that CCA with trace as positive most accurately estimated infection prevalence.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAnimalsAntigens, HelminthChildCote d'IvoireFecesHumansReagent Kits, DiagnosticReference StandardsSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniSensitivity and SpecificityUgandaAntigens, HelminthReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID29220354
PMCPMC5738141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.