Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29219968›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Programmable self-assembly of three-dimensional nanostructures from 10,000 unique components.

Luvena L Ong, Nikita Hanikel, Omar K Yaghi, Casey Grun, Maximilian T Strauss, Patrick Bron, Josephine Lai-Kee-Him, Florian Schueder, Bei Wang, Pengfei Wang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Exploring Size-Controlled Exciton Evolution Using DNA Libraries.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hierarchical self-assembly for high-yield addressable complexity at fixed conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Magnetic decoupling as a proofreading strategy for high-yield, time-efficient microscale self-assembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luvena L OngWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Nikita HanikelWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Omar K YaghiWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Casey GrunWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Maximilian T StraussWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Patrick BronCentre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048, INSERM U1054, F-34000 Montpellier, France.
Josephine Lai-Kee-HimCentre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048, INSERM U1054, F-34000 Montpellier, France.
Florian SchuederWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Bei WangWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Pengfei WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Jocelyn Y KishiWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Cameron MyhrvoldWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Allen ZhuWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Ralf JungmannMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried Munich, Germany.
Gaetan BellotInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR 5203, INSERM U1191, F-34000 Montpellier, France.
Yonggang KeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Peng YinWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Funding

Super-resolution imaging via programmable autonomous blinkingR01EB018659 · NIBIB · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI YIN, PENG · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
Engineering Bioimaging Probes Based on Triggered Molecular GeometryDP2OD007292 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI YIN, PENG · 2010 to 2010
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018659NIH HHS DP2 OD007292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) are widely used to construct nanometre-scale structures with ever increasing complexity, with possible application in fields such as structural biology, biophysics, synthetic biology and photonics. The nanostructures are formed through one-pot self-assembly, with early kilodalton-scale examples containing typically tens of unique DNA strands. The introduction of DNA origami, which uses many staple strands to fold one long scaffold strand into a desired structure, has provided access to megadalton-scale nanostructures that contain hundreds of unique DNA strands. Even larger DNA origami structures are possible, but manufacturing and manipulating an increasingly long scaffold strand remains a challenge. An alternative and more readily scalable approach involves the assembly of DNA bricks, which each consist of four short binding domains arranged so that the bricks can interlock. This approach does not require a scaffold; instead, the short DNA brick strands self-assemble according to specific inter-brick interactions. First-generation bricks used to create three-dimensional structures are 32 nucleotides long, consisting of four eight-nucleotide binding domains. Protocols have been designed to direct the assembly of hundreds of distinct bricks into well formed structures, but attempts to create larger structures have encountered practical challenges and had limited success. Here we show that DNA bricks with longer, 13-nucleotide binding domains make it possible to self-assemble 0.1-1-gigadalton, three-dimensional nanostructures from tens of thousands of unique components, including a 0.5-gigadalton cuboid containing about 30,000 unique bricks and a 1-gigadalton rotationally symmetric tetramer. We also assembled a cuboid that contains around 10,000 bricks and about 20,000 uniquely addressable, 13-base-pair 'voxels' that serves as a molecular canvas for three-dimensional sculpting. Complex, user-prescribed, three-dimensional cavities can be produced within this molecular canvas, enabling the creation of shapes such as letters, a helicoid and a teddy bear. We anticipate that with further optimization of structure design, strand synthesis and assembly procedure even larger structures could be accessible, which could be useful for applications such as positioning functional components.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNanotechnologyNucleic Acid ConformationAnimalsDNAElectron Microscope TomographyImaging, Three-DimensionalNanostructuresNucleotidesRotationSequence Analysis, DNAUrsidaeDNANucleotides

Identifiers

PMID29219968
PMCPMC5786436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.