ArticleNature2017
Gigadalton-scale shape-programmable DNA assemblies.
Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
163 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expandable DNA-origami rings as a nanomechanical platform for studying disordered nucleoporins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Programmable Edge-to-Edge Assembly of RNA Nanostructures.ACS nano · 2026Article
- From Blueprint to Breakthrough: How Far Can We Fold DNA Origami for Nano-Enabled Technologies?JACS Au · 2026Review
- Dynamic DNA Nanomachines for Biosensing and Drug Delivery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- NanorulerQA: quantitative quality analysis of dual-color DNA nanorulers via single-molecule photobleaching step counting and spatio-temporal colocalization.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Ultra-Fast Isothermal Formation of DNA Nanostructures in Culture Media: Application to In Situ Assembly of DNA Origami With Living Cells.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Expanding DNA alphabet adds a previously unknown dimension to nanostructures.Science advances · 2026Article
- Modular programming of interaction and geometric specificity enables assembly of complex DNA origami nanostructures.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Acoustically seeded fabrication of a DNA tesseract into a conductive wire.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Hierarchical self-assembly for high-yield addressable complexity at fixed conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- DNA Condensation-Inspired Assembly of DNA Nanotubes into Reversible Superstructures: A Base Pairing-Orthogonal Way to Create Rings, Bundles, or Vast Networks.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Economical and Versatile Subunit Design Principles for Self-Assembled DNA Origami Structures.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Computer Simulations Show That Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Enhances Self-Assembly.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Microswimmers That Flex: Advancing Microswimmers with Templated Assembly and Responsive DNA Nanostructures.Accounts of materials research · 2025Article
- Modulating transformation of DNA origami nanoarray via sequence design.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Local structural flexibility drives oligomorphism in computationally designed protein assemblies.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Fabrication of Functional 3D Nanoarchitectures via Atomic Layer Deposition on DNA Origami Crystals.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Beyond Dimerization: Harnessing Tetrameric Coiled-Coils for Nanostructure Assembly.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Fully addressable designer superstructures assembled from one single modular DNA origami.Nature communications · 2025Article
103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural biomolecular assemblies such as molecular motors, enzymes, viruses and subcellular structures often form by self-limiting hierarchical oligomerization of multiple subunits. Large structures can also assemble efficiently from a few components by combining hierarchical assembly and symmetry, a strategy exemplified by viral capsids. De novo protein design and RNA and DNA nanotechnology aim to mimic these capabilities, but the bottom-up construction of artificial structures with the dimensions and complexity of viruses and other subcellular components remains challenging. Here we show that natural assembly principles can be combined with the methods of DNA origami to produce gigadalton-scale structures with controlled sizes. DNA sequence information is used to encode the shapes of individual DNA origami building blocks, and the geometry and details of the interactions between these building blocks then control their copy numbers, positions and orientations within higher-order assemblies. We illustrate this strategy by creating planar rings of up to 350 nanometres in diameter and with atomic masses of up to 330 megadaltons, micrometre-long, thick tubes commensurate in size to some bacilli, and three-dimensional polyhedral assemblies with sizes of up to 1.2 gigadaltons and 450 nanometres in diameter. We achieve efficient assembly, with yields of up to 90 per cent, by using building blocks with validated structure and sufficient rigidity, and an accurate design with interaction motifs that ensure that hierarchical assembly is self-limiting and able to proceed in equilibrium to allow for error correction. We expect that our method, which enables the self-assembly of structures with sizes approaching that of viruses and cellular organelles, can readily be used to create a range of other complex structures with well defined sizes, by exploiting the modularity and high degree of addressability of the DNA origami building blocks used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29219966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.