ArticleEye (London, England)2018
Comparative study of long-term outcomes of accelerated and conventional collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- [Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: real-life data and Committee for Refractive Surgery (KRC) recommendations].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Femtosecond Laser Created Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments for Keratoconus.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Review
- Ten Years' Experience Using Proxymetacaine Hydrochloride 0.5% for Postoperative Pain Control in Epithelium-Off Corneal Crosslinking.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term Effects and Prognostic Factors of Accelerated Cross-Linking with Retention Ring-assisted Riboflavin Application on Keratoconus Progression.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2025Article
- Application of a Revised Tissue Saving Protocol for Combined Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Cross-Linking in a Cohort Having Pellucid Marginal Degeneration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- A Comparison Between Cross-Linking Protocols in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus: A Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Topography-guided corneal surface laser ablation combined with simultaneous accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus.BMC ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Protective effects of riboflavin-UVA-mediated posterior sclera collagen cross-linking in a guinea pig model of form-deprived myopia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Comparative Results Between "Epi-Off" Accelerated and "Epi-Off" Standard Corneal Collagen Crosslinking-UVA in Progressive Keratoconus - 7 Years of Follow-Up.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021Article
- Transepithelial Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: Two-Year Results.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cmEye (London, England) · 2019Article
- Corneal densitometry after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus.International ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Effect of the retention ring-assisted continuous application of riboflavin in pulsed-light accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking on the progression of keratoconus.BMC ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Three-Year Corneal Biomechanical Outcomes Assessed by CORVIS ST Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging After Epithelium-Off Conventional Versus Accelerated Cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeTo compare the long-term outcomes of accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) to conventional CXL for progressive keratoconus.Patients and methodsComparative clinical study of consecutive progressive keratoconic eyes that underwent either accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.