ReviewInternational journal of radiation biology2018
Track to the future: historical perspective on the importance of radiation track structure and DNA as a radiobiological target.
Review in International journal of radiation biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering the holobiont: Synthetic biology strategies for reversing bioenergetic collapse in radiation enteritis.AIMS microbiology · 2026Review
- Development of a simple multiple mutation detection system using seed-coat flavonoid pigments in irradiated Arabidopsis MScientific reports · 2022Article
- Chromatin and the Cellular Response to Particle Radiation-Induced Oxidative and Clustered DNA Damage.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2020Review
- Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: From Prediction to Detection Challenges and Biological Significance.Cancers · 2019Review
- Predicting DNA damage foci and their experimental readout with 2D microscopy: a unified approach applied to photon and neutron exposures.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Clustered DNA Damages induced by 0.5 to 30 eV Electrons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Cullin Ring Ubiquitin Ligases (CRLs) in Cancer: Responses to Ionizing Radiation (IR) Treatment.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Repurposing Drugs for Cancer Radiotherapy: Early Successes and Emerging Opportunities.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUnderstanding the mechanisms behind induced biological response following exposure to ionizing radiation is not only important in assessing the risk associated with human exposure, but potentially can help identify ways of improving the efficacy of radiotherapy. Over the decades, there has been much discussion on what is the key biological target for radiation action and its associated size. It was already known in the 1930s that microscopic features of radiation significantly influenced biological outcomes. This resulted in the development of classic target theory, leading to field of microdosimetry and subsequently nanodosimetry, studying the inhomogeneity and stochastics of interactions, along with the identification of DNA as a key target.
conclusionsUltimately, the biological response has been found to be dependent on the radiation track structure (spatial and temporal distribution of ionization and excitation events). Clustering of energy deposition on the nanometer scale has been shown to play a critical role in determining biological response, producing not just simple isolated DNA lesions but also complex clustered lesions that are more difficult to repair. The frequency and complexity of these clustered damage sites are typically found to increase with increasing LET. However in order to fully understand the consequences, it is important to look at the relative distribution of these lesions over larger dimensions along the radiation track, up to the micrometer scale. Correlation of energy deposition events and resulting sites of DNA damage can ultimately result in complex gene mutations and complex chromosome rearrangements following repair, with the frequency and spectrum of the resulting rearrangements critically dependent on the spatial and temporal distribution of these sites and therefore the radiation track. Due to limitations in the techniques used to identify these rearrangements it is likely that the full complexity of the genetic rearrangements that occur has yet to be revealed. This paper discusses these issues from a historical perspective, with many of these historical studies still having relevance today. These can not only cast light on current studies but guide future studies, especially with the increasing range of biological techniques available. So, let us build on past knowledge to effectively explore the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.