Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29219085›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2017

Perceptions about data-informed decisions: an assessment of information-use in high HIV-prevalence settings in South Africa.

Edward Nicol, Debbie Bradshaw, Jeannine Uwimana-Nicol, Lilian Dudley

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Regulatory framework for health information systems in Ethiopia: A qualitative document analysis.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of family planning information by primary healthcare clinic managers in South Africa.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edward NicolBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. Edward.Nicol@mrc.ac.za.
Debbie BradshawBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jeannine Uwimana-NicolSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Lilian DudleyDivision of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Rwanda · RWWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation-use is an integral component of a routine health information system and essential to influence policy-making, program actions and research. Despite an increased amount of routine data collected, planning and resource-allocation decisions made by health managers for managing HIV programs are often not based on data. This study investigated the use of information, and barriers to using routine data for monitoring the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) programs in two high HIV-prevalence districts in South Africa.

methodsWe undertook an observational study using a multi-method approach, including an inventory of facility records and reports. The performance of routine information systems management (PRISM) diagnostic 'Use of Information' tool was used to assess the PMTCT information system for evidence of data use in 57 health facilities in two districts. Twenty-two in-depth interviews were conducted with key informants to investigate barriers to information use in decision-making. Participants were purposively selected based on their positions and experience with either producing PMTCT data and/or using data for management purposes. We computed descriptive statistics and used a general inductive approach to analyze the qualitative data.

resultsDespite the availability of mechanisms and processes to facilitate information-use in about two-thirds of the facilities, evidence of information-use (i.e., indication of some form of information-use in available RHIS reports) was demonstrated in 53% of the facilities. Information was inadequately used at district and facility levels to inform decisions and planning, but was selectively used for reporting and monitoring program outputs at the provincial level. The inadequate use of information stemmed from organizational issues such as the lack of a culture of information-use, lack of trust in the data, and the inability of program and facility managers to analyze, interpret and use information.

conclusionsManagers' inability to use information implied that decisions for program implementation and improving service delivery were not always based on data. This lack of data use could influence the delivery of health care services negatively. Facility and program managers should be provided with opportunities for capacity development as well as practice-based, in-service training, and be supported to use information for planning, management and decision-making.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingData AccuracyFemaleHealth FacilitiesHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalInformation DisseminationMedical InformaticsPerceptionPrevalenceSouth AfricaBarriers to information useCompetenceCulture of information-useData accuracyData-usePMTCTPromotion of information-useUse of information

Identifiers

PMID29219085
PMCPMC5773892
OpenAlexW2774201531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.