Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29219067›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Prediction of essential proteins based on subcellular localization and gene expression correlation.

Yetian Fan, Xiwei Tang, Xiaohua Hu, Wei Wu, Qing Ping

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yetian FanSchool of Mathematics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Xiwei TangDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, 410205, China. tangxiwei2010@gmail.com.
Xiaohua HuCollege of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, 19104, USA.
Wei WuSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116023, China.
Qing PingCollege of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEssential proteins are indispensable to the survival and development process of living organisms. To understand the functional mechanisms of essential proteins, which can be applied to the analysis of disease and design of drugs, it is important to identify essential proteins from a set of proteins first. As traditional experimental methods designed to test out essential proteins are usually expensive and laborious, computational methods, which utilize biological and topological features of proteins, have attracted more attention in recent years. Protein-protein interaction networks, together with other biological data, have been explored to improve the performance of essential protein prediction.

resultsThe proposed method SCP is evaluated on Saccharomyces cerevisiae datasets and compared with five other methods. The results show that our method SCP outperforms the other five methods in terms of accuracy of essential protein prediction.

conclusionsIn this paper, we propose a novel algorithm named SCP, which combines the ranking by a modified PageRank algorithm based on subcellular compartments information, with the ranking by Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) calculated from gene expression data. Experiments show that subcellular localization information is promising in boosting essential protein prediction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, EssentialProtein Interaction MapsComputational BiologySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSubcellular FractionsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsEssential proteinsModified PageRank algorithmProtein-protein interaction networksSubcellular localization information

Identifiers

PMID29219067
PMCPMC5773913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.