Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29219025›Full record

ArticleCartilage2018

The Effect of Growth Hormone on Chondral Defect Repair.

Natalie R Danna, Bryan G Beutel, Austin J Ramme, Thorsten Kirsch, Oran D Kennedy, Eric Strauss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The synthetic artificial stem cell (SASC): Shifting the paradigm of cell therapy in regenerative engineering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie R Danna1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Bryan G Beutel1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Austin J Ramme1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Thorsten Kirsch1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Oran D Kennedy1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Eric Strauss1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Focal chondral defects alter joint mechanics and cause pain and debilitation. Microfracture is a surgical technique used to treat such defects. This technique involves penetration of subchondral bone to release progenitor cells and growth factors from the marrow to promote cartilage regeneration. Often this results in fibrocartilage formation rather than structured hyaline cartilage. Some reports have suggested use of growth hormone (GH) with microfracture to augment cartilage regeneration. Our objective was to test whether intra-articular (IA) GH in conjunction with microfracture, improves cartilage repair in a rabbit chondral defect model. We hypothesized that GH would exhibit a dose-dependent improvement in regeneration. Design Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits received bilateral femoral chondral defects and standardized microfracture repair. One group of animals ( n = 8) received low-dose GH by IA injection in the left knee, and the other group ( n = 8) received high-dose GH in the same manner. All animals received IA injection of saline in the contralateral knee as control. Serum assays, macroscopic grading, and histological analyses were used to assess any improvements in cartilage repair. Results Peripheral serum GH was not elevated postoperatively ( P = 0.21). There was no improvement in macroscopic grading scores among either of the GH dosages ( P = 0.83). Scoring of safranin-O-stained sections showed no improvement in cartilage regeneration and some evidence of increased bone formation in the GH-treated knees. Conclusions Treatment with either low- or high-dose IA GH does not appear to enhance short-term repair in a rabbit chondral defect model.

Indexed as

AnimalsCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesFemaleFractures, StressGrowth HormoneHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularKnee JointModels, AnimalPituitary Hormones, AnteriorPostoperative PeriodRabbitsGrowth HormonePituitary Hormones, Anteriorchondral defectgrowth hormonemicrofracturerabbit model

Identifiers

PMID29219025
PMCPMC5724667
OpenAlexW2562892633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.