ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2018
Single subject transcriptome analysis to identify functionally signed gene set or pathway activity.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Single-subject studies'-derived analyses unveil altered biomechanisms between very small cohorts: implications for rare diseases.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Accounting for extra-binomial variability with differentially expressed genetic pathway data: a collaborative bioinformatic study.Stat (International Statistical Institute)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of single-subject transcriptome response data is an unmet need of precision medicine, made challenging by the high dimension, dynamic nature and difficulty in extracting meaningful signals from biological or stochastic noise. We have proposed a method for single subject analysis that uses a mixture model for transcript fold-change clustering from isogenically paired samples, followed by integration of these distributions with Gene Ontology Biological Processes (GO-BP) to reduce dimension and identify functional attributes. We then extended these methods to develop functional signing metrics for gene set process regulation by incorporating biological repressor relationships encoded in GO-BP as negatively_regulates edges. Results revealed reproducible and biologically meaningful signals from analysis of a single subject's response, opening the door to future transcriptomic studies where subject and resource availability are currently limiting. We used inbred mouse strains fed different diets to provide isogenic biological replicates, permitting rigorous validation of our method. We compared significant genotype-specific GO-BP term results for overlap and rank order across three replicate pairs per genotype, and cross-methods to reference standards (limma+FET, SAM+FET, and GSEA). All single-subject analytics findings were robust and highly reproducible (median area under the ROC curve=0.96, n=24 genotypes × 3 replicates), providing confidence and validation of this approach for analyses in single subjects. R code is available online at http://www.lussiergroup.org/publications/PathwayActivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29218900PMC5730358What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.