Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29218760›Full record

SynthesisPediatric transplantation2018

A systematic review of immunosuppressant adherence interventions in transplant recipients: Decoding the streetlight effect.

S Duncan, R A Annunziato, C Dunphy, D LaPointe Rudow, B L Shneider, E Shemesh

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A remote intervention to improve medication nonadherence guided by a marker of risk derived from the electronic health records of adolescent transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Patient Engagement and Medication Consistency with Adolescent Heart Transplant Recipients.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2024
    Article
  13. Electronic health record-enabled routine assessment of medication adherence after solid organ transplantation: the time is now.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Posttraumatic stress and medication adherence in pediatric transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S DuncanDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
R A AnnunziatoDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
C DunphyDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
D LaPointe RudowDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
B L ShneiderDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
E ShemeshDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-3423
Fordham University · USMount Sinai Hospital · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Improving Medication Adherence in children who had a Liver Transplant: iMALTU34DK112661 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SHEMESH, EYAL · 2016 to 2017
$643k
NIDDK NIH HHS U34 DK112661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-adherence to immunosuppressant medications is an important risk factor for graft dysfunction. To evaluate the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions, we reviewed adherence intervention studies in solid organ transplant recipients (all ages). Using the following databases: PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, we identified 41 eligible studies. Only three non-randomized trials showed a possible positive effect on objective indicators of transplant outcomes (such as rejection, liver enzyme levels, kidney function). None of the 21 RCTs showed an improvement in transplant outcomes. Three studies showed a higher rate of adverse events in the intervention group as compared with controls, although this may be related to ascertainment bias. Improvement in adherence as measured indirectly (eg, with electronic monitoring devices) was not aligned with effects on transplant outcomes. We conclude that adherence interventions, to date, have largely been ineffective in improving transplant outcomes. To improve this track record, intervention efforts may wish to concentrate on non-adherent patients (rather than use convenience sampling, which excludes many of the patients who need the intervention), use direct measures of adherence to guide the interventions, and employ strategies that are intensive and yet engaging enough to ensure that non-adherent patients are able to participate.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceOrgan TransplantationGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive Agentsimmunosuppressionpediatric transplantationrejection

Identifiers

PMID29218760
PMCPMC5811374
OpenAlexW2774369903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.