Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29218721›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2018

Functional characterization of a second pedal peptide/orcokinin-type neuropeptide signaling system in the starfish Asterias rubens.

Ming Lin, Michaela Egertová, Cleidiane G Zampronio, Alexandra M Jones, Maurice R Elphick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Somatostatin-type and allatostatin-C-type neuropeptides are paralogous and have opposing myoregulatory roles in an echinoderm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming LinSchool of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Mile End Road, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Michaela EgertováSchool of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Mile End Road, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Cleidiane G ZampronioSchool of Life Sciences and Proteomics Research Technology Platform, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Alexandra M JonesSchool of Life Sciences and Proteomics Research Technology Platform, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Maurice R ElphickSchool of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Mile End Road, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9169-0048
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M001032/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M001644/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molluscan pedal peptides (PPs) and arthropod orcokinins (OKs) are prototypes of a family of neuropeptides that have been identified in several phyla. Recently, starfish myorelaxant peptide (SMP) was identified as a PP/OK-type neuropeptide in the starfish Patiria pectinifera (phylum Echinodermata). Furthermore, analysis of transcriptome sequence data from the starfish Asterias rubens revealed two PP/OK-type precursors: an SMP-type precursor (A. rubens PP-like neuropeptide precursor 1; ArPPLNP1) and a second precursor (ArPPLNP2). We reported previously a detailed analysis of ArPPLNP1 expression in A. rubens and here we report the first functional characterization ArPPLNP2-derived neuropeptides. Sequencing of a cDNA encoding ArPPLNP2 revealed that it comprises eleven related neuropeptides (ArPPLN2a-k), the structures of several of which were confirmed using mass spectrometry. Analysis of the expression of ArPPLNP2 and neuropeptides derived from this precursor using mRNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry revealed a widespread distribution, including expression in radial nerve cords, circumoral nerve ring, digestive system, tube feet and innervation of interossicular muscles. In vitro pharmacology revealed that the ArPPLNP2-derived neuropeptide ArPPLN2h has no effect on the contractility of tube feet or the body wall-associated apical muscle, contrasting with the relaxing effect of ArPPLN1b (ArSMP) on these preparations. ArPPLN2h does, however, cause dose-dependent relaxation of cardiac stomach preparations, with greater potency/efficacy than ArPPLN1b and with similar potency/efficacy to the SALMFamide neuropeptide S2. In conclusion, there are similarities in the expression patterns of ArPPLNP1 and ArPPLNP2 but our data also indicate specialization in the roles of neuropeptides derived from these two PP/OK-type precursors in starfish.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAsteriasCloning, MolecularMass SpectrometryNeuropeptidesRadial NerveRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionTranscriptomeNeuropeptidesorcokininpedal peptideRNA, MessengerSALMFamide 2deuterostomeechinodermneuropeptideorcokininpedal peptideRRID: AB_2716765starfish

Identifiers

PMID29218721
PMCPMC5814872
OpenAlexW2774361525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.