Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29218617›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Evaluation of an adaptive detector collimation for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography with third-generation dual-source CT.

Michael Messerli, Patricia Dewes, Jan-Erik Scholtz, Christophe Arendt, Simon Wildermuth, Thomas J Vogl, Ralf W Bauer

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael MesserliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Patricia DewesDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jan-Erik ScholtzMassachusetts General Hospital, Cardiac CT PET MRI Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christophe ArendtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simon WildermuthClinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Thomas J VoglDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ralf W BauerRNS Gemeinschaftspraxis GbR, Atle Schmelze 20, 65201, Wiesbaden, Germany. ralfwbauer@aol.com.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEHarvard University · USPraxis für Humangenetik · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of St. Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the impact of an adaptive detector collimation on the dose parameters and accurateness of scan length adaption at prospectively ECG-triggered sequential cardiac CT with a wide-detector third-generation dual-source CT.

methodsIdeal scan lengths for human hearts were retrospectively derived from 103 triple-rule-out examinations. These measures were entered into the new scanner operated in prospectively ECG-triggered sequential cardiac scan mode with three different detector settings: (1) adaptive collimation, (2) fixed 64 × 0.6-mm collimation, and (3) fixed 96 × 0.6-mm collimation. Differences in effective scan length and deviation from the ideal scan length and dose parameters (CTDIvol, DLP) were documented.

resultsThe ideal cardiac scan length could be matched by the adaptive collimation in every case while the mean scanned length was longer by 15.4% with the 64 × 0.6 mm and by 27.2% with the fixed 96 × 0.6-mm collimation. While the DLP was almost identical between the adaptive and the 64 × 0.6-mm collimation (83 vs. 89 mGycm at 120 kV), it was 62.7% higher with the 96 × 0.6-mm collimation (135 mGycm), p < 0.001.

conclusionThe adaptive detector collimation for prospectively ECG-triggered sequential acquisition allows for adjusting the scan length as accurate as this can only be achieved with a spiral acquisition. This technique allows keeping patient exposure low where patient dose would significantly increase with the traditional step-and-shoot mode. KEY POINTS: • Adaptive detector collimation allows keeping patient exposure low in cardiac CT. • With novel detectors the desired scan length can be accurately matched. • Differences in detector settings may cause 62.7% of excessive dose.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyProspective StudiesRadiation DosageAdaptive detector collimationCoronary CT angiographyDual-source CTMulti-detector CTOver-ranging

Identifiers

PMID29218617
OpenAlexW2775095182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.