Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29218547›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2018

Expression of Class I Histone Deacetylases in Ipsilateral and Contralateral Hemispheres after the Focal Photothrombotic Infarction in the Mouse Brain.

Svetlana Demyanenko, Maria Neginskaya, Elena Berezhnaya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Svetlana DemyanenkoLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Academy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, prospect Stachki 194/1, Rostov-on-Don, 344090, Russia. demyanenkosvetlana@gmail.com.
Maria NeginskayaLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Academy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, prospect Stachki 194/1, Rostov-on-Don, 344090, Russia.
Elena BerezhnayaLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Academy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, prospect Stachki 194/1, Rostov-on-Don, 344090, Russia.
Southern Federal University · RU

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 16-04-01135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone acetylation and deacetylation are among the most important epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression. Nonselective inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDAC) can protect brain cells during ischemia and stroke. However, which HDAC isoform is involved in this effect is unknown. Some isoforms of histone deacetylases (HDACs) protect brain cells after ischemia, whereas others can promote their death. Most studies consider early periods (1-24 h) after stroke, whereas little is known on the involvement of HDACs during recovery after stroke. In this study, cellular and intracellular rearrangement of class I HDACs (HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC8) was investigated at late periods after photothrombotic infarction (PTI) of the mouse sensorimotor cortex in intact tissue that surrounds the ischemia core, in the corresponding region of the contralateral hemisphere, and in the hippocampus. Each HDAC isoform had a specific pattern of expression and intracellular distribution in neurons and astrocytes at different periods after the ischemia. We did not observe ischemia-induced changes in the subcellular localization of HDACs under study. Three days after the PTI, the expression of HDAC2 was increased in neurons of the damaged hemisphere. The activity of HDAC2 and HDAC8 was elevated 7 days after the ischemia both in neurons and astrocytes of the studied brain structures; the activity of HDAC8 was also increased 14 days after the ischemia. It is notable that the expression of class I HDACs in the intact hemisphere changes in the same way as their expression in the living tissue of the damaged hemisphere. HDAC1 was found both in the nuclei and cytoplasm of the brain cells; HDAC2 was predominantly localized in the nuclei, and HDAC8 was predominantly observed in the cytoplasm. This in addition to the regulation of gene transcription indicates nontranscriptional activity of HDAC1 and HDAC8 during recovery of the brain tissue after the ischemia. HDAC2 and HDAC8 were identified as potential mediators in an early recovery period after stroke, suggesting that selective inhibitors and activators of HDACs can be considered for therapeutic approaches in this period.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain InfarctionBrain IschemiaDisease Models, AnimalFunctional LateralityGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHistone DeacetylasesMaleMicePhosphopyruvate HydrataseStrokeTime FactorsGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHistone DeacetylasesPhosphopyruvate HydrataseBrain regenerationClass I histone deacetylasesCortexPhotothrombotic infarctionStroke

Identifiers

PMID29218547
OpenAlexW2775809871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.