Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29218301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2017

Long-term Outcomes after Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) following In-Field Failure of Initial SRS for Brain Metastases.

Nitesh Rana, Praveen Pendyala, Ryan K Cleary, Guozhen Luo, Zhiguo Zhao, Lola B Chambless, Anthony J Cmelak, Albert Attia, Mark J Stavas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Efficacy of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for locally recurrent brain metastases after initial SRT and characteristics of target population.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nitesh RanaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Praveen PendyalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Ryan K ClearyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Guozhen LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Zhiguo ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Lola B ChamblessDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Anthony J CmelakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Albert AttiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Mark J StavasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI STACIE B DUSETZINA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal treatment strategy following local recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains unclear. While upfront SRS has been extensively studied, few reports focus on outcomes after retreatment. Here, we report the results following a second course of SRS for local recurrence of brain metastases previously treated with SRS.

methodsUsing institutional database, patients who received salvage SRS (SRS2) following in-field failure of initial SRS (SRS1) for brain metastases were identified. Radionecrosis and local failure were defined radiographically by MRI following SRS2. The primary endpoint was defined as the time from SRS2 to the date of all-cause death or last follow-up [overall survival (OS)]. The secondary endpoints included local failure-free survival (LFFS) and radionecrosis-free survival, defined as the time from SRS2 to the date of local failure or radionecrosis, or last follow-up, respectively.

resultsTwenty-eight patients with 32 brain metastases were evaluated between years 2004 and 2015. The median interval between SRS1 and SRS2 was 9.7 months. Median OS was 22.0 months. Median LFFS time after SRS2 was 13.6 months. The overall local control rate following SRS2 was 84.4%. The 1- and 2-year local control rates are 88.3% (95% CI, 76.7-100%) and 80.3% (95% CI, 63.5-100%), respectively. The overall rate of radionecrosis following SRS2 was 18.8%. On univariate analysis, higher prescribed isodose line (

conclusionIn select patients, repeat LINAC-based SRS following recurrence remains a reasonable option leading to long-term survival and local control. Radionecrosis approaches 20% for high risk individuals and parallels historic values.

Indexed as

brain metastasesradionecrosisreirradiationrepeat SRSstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID29218301
PMCPMC5703829
OpenAlexW2770505781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.