Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29218231›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2017

Indications for hydrodilatation for frozen shoulder.

S Rymaruk, C Peach

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04687735 (Minimally Invasive Technique to Increase the Range of Motion of the Shoulder Joint in Frozen Shoulder), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04687735 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Minimally Invasive Technique to Increase the Range of Motion of the Shoulder Joint in Frozen Shoulder: Single Arm Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllevio Pain Management ClinicRan2021 to 2022Enrolled34ConditionsFrozen ShoulderArmsIntervention after nerve block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S RymarukUniversity Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
C PeachUniversity Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frozen shoulder causes significant functional disability and pain in a population group constituted by patients who are often middle-aged and working.Frozen shoulder remains poorly understood. The available literature is limited and often prone to bias.A rapid, non-surgical and cost-effective treatment that reduces pain and restores function is an attractive option.Hydrodilatation is a potential first-line treatment of frozen shoulder in secondary care. Cite this article:

Indexed as

aetiologyconservative treatmentfrozen shoulderhydrodilatationoperative treatmentpathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID29218231
PMCPMC5706054
OpenAlexW2769623784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.