ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2017
Rational lung tissue and animal models for rapid breath tests to determine pneumonia and pathogens.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern approaches for detection of volatile organic compounds in metabolic studies focusing on pathogenic bacteria: Current state of the art.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2024Review
- Current Limitations of Staph Infection Diagnostics, and the Role for VOCs in Achieving Culture-Independent Detection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Volatile Organic Compounds, Bacterial Airway Microbiome, Spirometry and Exercise Performance of Patients after Surgical Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Breath analysis as a diagnostic and screening tool for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review.Translational lung cancer research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study works to develop novel models that may be adopted for earlier non-invasive breathomics tests to determine pneumonia pathogens.
methodsTwo types of pneumonia models were created, both
resultsPneumonia and pathogen-specific discriminating VOC patterns (1H-Pyrrole-3-carbonitrile, Diethyl phthalate, Cedrol, Decanoic acid, Cyclohexane, Diisooctyl phthalate) were determined.
conclusionOur study successfully generated nosocomial pneumonia models for pneumonia diagnosis and pathogen-discriminating breath tests. The tests may allow for earlier pneumonia and pathogen diagnoses, and may transfer empirical therapy to targeted therapy earlier, thus improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29218109PMC5714795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.