ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2017
Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Eye as a Window to Brain Health: Can Retinal Imaging and AI Modeling Predict Alzheimer's Disease?Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Motor Circuit Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Methods for Tattooing Xenopus laevis with a Rotary Tattoo Machine.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024Article
- Special Issue "Neurobiology of Protein Synuclein".International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal monitoring of hard tissue development reveals unknown features of tooth and bone development.Science advances · 2023Article
- Review
- Embryonic and skeletal development of the albino African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis).Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Formation and characterization of BMP2/GDF5 and BMP4/GDF5 heterodimers.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Recessive aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase disorders: lessons learned fromFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Article
- Tissue Rotation of theJournal of developmental biology · 2022Article
- Spinal cord regeneration - the origins of progenitor cells for functional rebuilding.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
- Synuclein Analysis in AdultInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Monitoring NAD(H) and NADP(H) dynamics during organismal development with genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2022Review
- Effects of Aluminium Contamination on the Nervous System of Freshwater Aquatic Vertebrates: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Form and Function of the Vertebrate and Invertebrate Blood-Brain Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Picroscope: low-cost system for simultaneous longitudinal biological imaging.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Micronutrient imbalance and common phenotypes in neural tube defects.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2021Review
- Fish-Ing for Enhancers in the Heart.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Mass spectrometry based proteomics for developmental neurobiology in the amphibian Xenopus laevis.Current topics in developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The spinal cord is the first central nervous system structure to develop during vertebrate embryogenesis, underscoring its importance to the organism. Because of its early formation, accessibility to the developing spinal cord in amniotes is challenging, often invasive and the experimental approaches amenable to model systems like mammals are limited. In contrast, amphibians, in general and the African-clawed frog
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.