Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29217736›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2018

Generation of Structural MR Images from Amyloid PET: Application to MR-Less Quantification.

Hongyoon Choi, Dong Soo Lee, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A deep learning model for generating [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  4. ImprovingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Generation of ConventionalMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fast and Accurate Amyloid Brain PET Quantification Without MRI Using Deep Neural Networks.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongyoon ChoiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Soo Lee
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural MR images concomitantly acquired with PET images can provide crucial anatomic information for precise quantitative analysis. However, in the clinical setting, not all the subjects have corresponding MR images. Here, we developed a model to generate structural MR images from amyloid PET using deep generative networks. We applied our model to quantification of cortical amyloid load without structural MR.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloidFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedAmyloiddeep learningflorbetapir PETgenerative adversarial networkMR generationPET quantification

Identifiers

PMID29217736
PMCPMC6910644
OpenAlexW2771491591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.