Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29217663›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2017

Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Hypertension.

Pedro Armario, David A Calhoun, Anna Oliveras, Pedro Blanch, Ernest Vinyoles, Jose R Banegas, Manuel Gorostidi, Julián Segura, Luis M Ruilope, Tanja Dudenbostel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Risk of heart failure in ambulatory resistant hypertension: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  5. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Anti-atherosclerotic therapies: Milestones, challenges, and emerging innovations.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Refractory hypertension: what do we know so far?Journal of human hypertension · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro ArmarioCardiovascular Risk Area, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Moisès Broggi Sant Joan Despi, University of Barcelona, Spain parmario@csi.cat parmariog@gmail.com.
David A CalhounVascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL.
Anna OliverasHypertension Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro BlanchDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Moisès Broggi Sant Joan Despi, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Ernest VinyolesDepartment of Medicine, La Mina Primary Care Center, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Jose R BanegasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Autónoma Madrid/IdiPAZ and CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel GorostidiDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, RedinRen Oviedo, Spain.
Julián SeguraHypertension Unit, Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Luis M RuilopeInstituto de Investigación Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Tanja DudenbostelVascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL.
Alejandro de la SierraInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to estimate the prevalence of refractory hypertension (RfH) and to determine the clinical differences between these patients and resistant hypertensives (RH). Secondly, we assessed the prevalence of white-coat RfH and clinical differences between true- and white-coat RfH patients. METHODS AND

resultsThe present analysis was conducted on the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry database containing 70 997 treated hypertensive patients. RH and RfH were defined by the presence of elevated office blood pressure (≥140 and/or 90 mm Hg) in patients treated with at least 3 (RH) and 5 (RfH) antihypertensive drugs. White-coat RfH was defined by RfH with normal (<130/80 mm Hg) 24-hour blood pressure. A total of 11.972 (16.9%) patients fulfilled the standard criteria of RH, and 955 (1.4%) were considered as having RfH. Compared with RH patients, those with RfH were younger, more frequently male, and after adjusting for age and sex, had increased prevalence of target organ damage, and previous cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of white coat RfH was lower than white-coat RH (26.7% versus 37.1%,

conclusionsThe prevalence of RfH was low and these patients had a greater cardiovascular risk profile compared with RH. One out of 4 patients with RfH have normal 24-hour blood pressure and less target organ damage, thus indicating the important role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in guiding antihypertensive therapy in difficult-to-treat patients.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSpainWhite Coat Hypertensionrefractory hypertensionresistant hypertensiontarget organ damagewhite coat refractory hypertension

Identifiers

PMID29217663
PMCPMC5779046
OpenAlexW2771161847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.