Trial reportLancet (London, England)2018
Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of two Zika virus DNA vaccine candidates in healthy adults: randomised, open-label, phase 1 clinical trials.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 178 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
VRC 319: A Phase I/Ib, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of A Zika Virus DNA Vaccine, VRC-ZKADNA085-00-VP, in Healthy Adults
VRC 320: A Phase I, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Zika Virus DNA Vaccine, VRC-ZKADNA090-00-VP, Administered Via Needle and Syringe or Needle-free Injector, PharmaJet, in Healthy Adults
VRC 705: A Phase 2/2B, Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy of a Zika Virus DNA Vaccine in Healthy Adults and Adolescents
Who cites it
178 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials.Reviews in medical virology · 2023Pooled it
- Pre-existing Immunity to Japanese Encephalitis Virus Alters CD4 T Cell Responses to Zika Virus Inactivated Vaccine.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Trial
- DNA priming and gp120 boosting induces HIV-specific antibodies in a randomized clinical trial.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Evaluation of a Zika virus-like particle-based vaccine in a highly penetrant non-human primate model of congenital infection.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Dengue vaccine: a hidden risk to Aedes aegypti control in Brazil.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2026Article
- Targeting the Zika virus envelope domains I and III as a recombinant vaccine protects mice from lethal challenge.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Opportunities and Challenges of mRNA and VLP Technologies for Pan-Flavivirus Vaccine Development: Focus on Conserved Quaternary Epitope Conformations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Role of the CLIC/GEEC Endocytic Pathway for Mechanophysical Transfection of DNA.The journal of gene medicine · 2025Review
- A Zika Virus-Like Particle Vaccine Mitigates Early Pregnancy Loss In Rhesus Macaques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Health Technology Assessment of mRNA Vaccines: Clinical, Economic, and Public Health Implications.Vaccines · 2025Review
- An updated review of Zika virus vaccine development.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2025Review
- Mouse strain-dependent neutralizing antibody responses to Zika virus vaccines.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Zika virus vaccines and monoclonal antibodies: a priority agenda for research and development.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Arboviruses: the hidden danger of the tropics.Archives of virology · 2025Review
- Promising Vaccine Formulations for Emerging Infectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Zika virus: an overview update.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025Review
- From Antibodies to Immunity: Assessing Correlates of Flavivirus Protection and Cross-Reactivity.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Toll-like receptor response to Zika virus infection: progress toward infection control.Npj viruses · 2025Review
- A bivalent self-amplifying RNA vaccine against yellow fever and Zika viruses.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Zika virus epidemic and associated congenital infections have prompted rapid vaccine development. We assessed two new DNA vaccines expressing premembrane and envelope Zika virus structural proteins.
methodsWe did two phase 1, randomised, open-label trials involving healthy adult volunteers. The VRC 319 trial, done in three centres, assessed plasmid VRC5288 (Zika virus and Japanese encephalitis virus chimera), and the VRC 320, done in one centre, assessed plasmid VRC5283 (wild-type Zika virus). Eligible participants were aged 18-35 years in VRC19 and 18-50 years in VRC 320. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 by a computer-generated randomisation schedule prepared by the study statistician. All participants received intramuscular injection of 4 mg vaccine. In VRC 319 participants were assigned to receive vaccinations via needle and syringe at 0 and 8 weeks, 0 and 12 weeks, 0, 4, and 8 weeks, or 0, 4, and 20 weeks. In VRC 320 participants were assigned to receive vaccinations at 0, 4, and 8 weeks via single-dose needle and syringe injection in one deltoid or split-dose needle and syringe or needle-free injection with the Stratis device (Pharmajet, Golden, CO, USA) in each deltoid. Both trials followed up volunteers for 24 months for the primary endpoint of safety, assessed as local and systemic reactogenicity in the 7 days after each vaccination and all adverse events in the 28 days after each vaccination. The secondary endpoint in both trials was immunogenicity 4 weeks after last vaccination. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02840487 and NCT02996461.
findingsVRC 319 enrolled 80 participants (20 in each group), and VRC 320 enrolled 45 participants (15 in each group). One participant in VRC 319 and two in VRC 320 withdrew after one dose of vaccine, but were included in the safety analyses. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated. All local and systemic symptoms were mild to moderate. In both studies, pain and tenderness at the injection site was the most frequent local symptoms (37 [46%] of 80 participants in VRC 319 and 36 [80%] of 45 in VRC 320) and malaise and headache were the most frequent systemic symptoms (22 [27%] and 18 [22%], respectively, in VRC 319 and 17 [38%] and 15 [33%], respectively, in VRC 320). For VRC5283, 14 of 14 (100%) participants who received split-dose vaccinations by needle-free injection had detectable positive antibody responses, and the geometric mean titre of 304 was the highest across all groups in both trials.
interpretationVRC5283 was well tolerated and has advanced to phase 2 efficacy testing.
fundingIntramural Research Program of the Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.