Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29217214›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2018

Reducing Physical Violence Toward Primary School Students With Disabilities.

Karen Devries, Hannah Kuper, Louise Knight, Elizabeth Allen, Nambusi Kyegombe, Lena Morgon Banks, Susan Kelly, Dipak Naker

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen DevriesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: karen.devries@lshtm.ac.uk.
Hannah KuperLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Louise KnightLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth AllenLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Nambusi KyegombeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Lena Morgon BanksLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Susan KellyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Dipak NakerRaising Voices, Kampala, Uganda.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L004321/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe tested whether the Good School Toolkit reduces physical violence from peers and school staff toward students with and without disabilities in Ugandan primary schools.

methodsWe conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, with data collected via cross-sectional surveys in 2012 and 2014. Forty-two primary schools in Luwero District, Uganda, were randomly assigned to receive the Good School Toolkit for 18 months, or to a waitlisted control group. The primary outcome was past week physical violence from school staff, measured by primary 5, 6, and 7 students' (aged 11-14 years) self-reports using the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Child Abuse Screening Tool-Child Institutional. Disability was assessed through the six Short Set Washington Group questions on functioning. Analyses were by intention to treat.

resultsAt endline, 53% of control group students with no functional difficulties reported violence from peers or school staff, versus 84% of students with a disability. Prevalence of past week physical violence from school staff was lower in intervention schools than in the control schools after the intervention, in students with no functional difficulties (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = .41, 95% confidence interval [CI .26-.65]), students with some functional difficulties (aOR = .36, 95% CI .21-.63), and students with disabilities (aOR = .29, 95% CI .14-.59). The intervention also reduced violence from peers in young adolescents, with no evidence of a difference in effect by disability status.

conclusionsThe Good School Toolkit is an effective intervention to reduce violence perpetrated by peers and school staff against young adolescents with disabilities in Ugandan primary schools.

Indexed as

SchoolsAdolescentChildChild AbuseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupPersons with DisabilitiesSchool TeachersStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaAdolescentsChildrenDisabilitiesPhysical abuseSchool-based interventionsUgandaViolence

Identifiers

PMID29217214
PMCPMC5817160
OpenAlexW2772839423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.