Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29217079›Full record

ArticleKidney international2018

Haploinsufficiency for the Six2 gene increases nephron progenitor proliferation promoting branching and nephron number.

Alexander N Combes, Sean Wilson, Belinda Phipson, Brandon B Binnie, Adler Ju, Kynan T Lawlor, Cristina Cebrian, Sarah L Walton, Ian M Smyth, Karen M Moritz and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Generation and characterization of Six2 conditional mice.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA Methyltransferase 1 Controls Nephron Progenitor Cell Renewal and Differentiation.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander N CombesDepartment of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: alexander.combes@unimelb.edu.au.
Sean WilsonMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Belinda PhipsonMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Brandon B BinnieDivision of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Adler JuDivision of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kynan T LawlorMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Cristina CebrianDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sarah L WaltonSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Centre for Children's Health Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ian M SmythDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Karen M MoritzSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Centre for Children's Health Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Raphael KopanDivision of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Alicia OshlackMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Melissa H LittleMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: melissa.little@mcri.edu.au.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

The Mechanism Regulating Renal Progenitor AgingR01DK106225 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI KOPAN, RAPHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of final nephron number in the kidney is poorly understood. Cessation of nephron formation occurs when the self-renewing nephron progenitor population commits to differentiation. Transcription factors within this progenitor population, such as SIX2, are assumed to control expression of genes promoting self-renewal such that homozygous Six2 deletion results in premature commitment and an early halt to kidney development. In contrast, Six2 heterozygotes were assumed to be unaffected. Using quantitative morphometry, we found a paradoxical 18% increase in ureteric branching and final nephron number in Six2 heterozygotes, despite evidence for reduced levels of SIX2 protein and transcript. This was accompanied by a clear shift in nephron progenitor identity with a distinct subset of downregulated progenitor genes such as Cited1 and Meox1 while other genes were unaffected. The net result was an increase in nephron progenitor proliferation, as assessed by elevated EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine) labeling, an increase in MYC protein, and transcriptional upregulation of MYC target genes. Heterozygosity for Six2 on an Fgf20-/- background resulted in premature differentiation of the progenitor population, confirming that progenitor regulation is compromised in Six2 heterozygotes. Overall, our studies reveal a unique dose response of nephron progenitors to the level of SIX2 protein in which the role of SIX2 in progenitor proliferation versus self-renewal is separable.

Indexed as

HaploinsufficiencyAnimalsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCell ProliferationCell Self RenewalFibroblast Growth FactorsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenotypeHeterozygoteHomeodomain ProteinsMice, KnockoutMorphogenesisNephronsNuclear ProteinsPhenotypeProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCited1 protein, mouseFgf20 protein, mouseFibroblast Growth FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsMeox1 protein, mouseMyc protein, mouseNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSix2 protein, mouseTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factorsgeneticsimagingkidney developmenttranscription regulation

Identifiers

PMID29217079
PMCPMC6361385
OpenAlexW2772648407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.