Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29216909›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2017

Which measuring site in ankylosing spondylitis is best to detect bone loss and what predicts the decline: results from a 5-year prospective study.

Anna Deminger, Eva Klingberg, Mattias Lorentzon, Mats Geijer, Jan Göthlin, Martin Hedberg, Eva Rehnberg, Hans Carlsten, Lennart T Jacobsson, Helena Forsblad-d'Elia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Factors associated with changes in volumetric bone mineral density and cortical area in men with ankylosing spondylitis: a 5-year prospective study using HRpQCT.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anna DemingerDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 480, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. anna.deminger@vgregion.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6423-1623
Eva KlingbergDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 480, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mattias LorentzonGeriatric Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mats GeijerDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Jan GöthlinDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal, 431 80, Mölndal, Sweden.
Martin HedbergSection of Rheumatology, Södra Älvsborg Hospital, 501 82, Borås, Sweden.
Eva RehnbergSection of Rheumatology, Alingsås Hospital, 441 33, Alingsås, Sweden.
Hans CarlstenDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 480, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lennart T JacobssonDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 480, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helena Forsblad-d'EliaDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 480, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SELund University · SESödra Älvsborg Hospital · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown increased prevalence of osteoporosis and increased risk for vertebral fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine anterior-posterior (AP) projection may be difficult to interpret due to the ligamentous calcifications, and the lateral projection might be a better measuring site. Our objectives were to investigate BMD changes after 5 years at different measuring sites in patients with AS and to evaluate disease-related variables and medications as predictors for BMD changes.

methodsIn a longitudinal study, BMD in Swedish AS patients, 50 ± 13 years old, was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the hip, the lumbar spine AP and lateral projections, and the total radius at baseline and after 5 years. Patients were assessed with questionnaires, blood samples, and spinal radiographs for grading of AS-related alterations in the spine with the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) and assessment of vertebral fractures by the Genant score. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to investigate predictors for BMD changes.

resultsOf 204 patients included at baseline, 168 (82%) were re-examined after 5 years (92 men and 76 women). BMD decreased significantly at the femoral neck and radius and increased significantly at the lumbar spine, both for AP and lateral projections. Mean C-reactive protein during follow-up predicted a decrease in the femoral neck BMD (change in %, β = -0.15, p = 0.046). Use of bisphosphonates predicted an increase in BMD at all measuring sites (p < 0.001 to 0.013), except for the total radius. Use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) predicted an increase in AP spinal BMD (β = 3.15, p = 0.012).

conclusionThe current study (which has a long follow-up, many measuring sites, and is the first to longitudinally assess the lateral projection of the spine in AS patients) surprisingly showed that lateral projection spinal BMD increased. This study suggests that the best site to assess bone loss in AS patients is the femoral neck and that inflammation has an adverse effect, and the use of bisphosphonates and TNFi has a positive effect, on BMD in AS patients.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisProspective StudiesSpondylitis, AnkylosingAnkylosing spondylitisBone mineral densityInflammationLongitudinal studyOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29216909
PMCPMC5721362
OpenAlexW2772830742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.