Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29216877›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2017

Donor-funded project's sustainability assessment: a qualitative case study of a results-based financing pilot in Koulikoro region, Mali.

Mathieu Seppey, Valéry Ridde, Laurence Touré, Abdourahmane Coulibaly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. La pérennité d'un projet de prévention et de prise en charge de la malnutrition au Niger.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mathieu SeppeyUniversité de Montréal, École de santé publique (ESPUM), P.O. Box 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada. Math.seppey@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-9168
Valéry RiddeUniversité de Montréal, École de santé publique (ESPUM), P.O. Box 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Laurence TouréMISELI (Association Malienne de Recherche et Formation en Anthropologie des Dynamiques Locales), cité el-Farako, BP E5448, Bamako, Mali.
Abdourahmane CoulibalyMISELI (Association Malienne de Recherche et Formation en Anthropologie des Dynamiques Locales), cité el-Farako, BP E5448, Bamako, Mali.

Funding

Institute of Population and Public Health 137901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults-based financing (RBF) is emerging as a new alternative to finance health systems in many African countries. In Mali, a pilot project was conducted to improve demand and supply of health services through financing performance in targeted services. No study has explored the sustainability process of such a project in Africa. This study's objectives were to understand the project's sustainability process and to assess its level of sustainability.

methodsSustainability was examined through its different determinants, phases, levels and contexts. These were explored using qualitative interviews to discern, via critical events, stakeholders' ideas regarding the project's sustainability. Data collection sites were chosen with the participation of different stakeholders, based on a variety of criteria (rural/urban settings, level of participation, RBF participants still present, etc.). Forty-nine stakeholders were then interviewed in six community health centres and two referral health centres (from 11/12/15 to 08/03/16), including health practitioners, administrators, and those involved in implementing and conceptualizing the program (government and NGOs). A theme analysis was done with the software © QDA Miner according to the study's conceptual framework.

resultsThe results of this project show a weak level of sustainability due to many factors. While some gains could be sustained (ex.: investments in long-term resources, high compatibility of values and codes, adapted design to the implementations contexts, etc.) other intended benefits could not (ex.: end of investments, lack of shared cultural artefacts around RBF, loss of different tasks and procedures, need of more ownership of the project by the local stakeholders). A lack of sustainability planning was observed, and few critical events were associated to phases of sustainability.

conclusionsWhile this RBF project aimed at increasing health agents' motivation through different mechanisms (supervision, investments, incentives, etc.), these results raise questions on what types of motivation could be more stable and what could be the place of local stakeholders in the project; all this with the aim of more sustained and efficient results.

Indexed as

Financial SupportPilot ProjectsHealth ServicesHumansMaliOrganizational Case StudiesProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchHealth financingInstitutionalisationMaliProject managementResultsRoutinisationSustainability

Identifiers

PMID29216877
PMCPMC5721604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.