ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2017
Impact of rapid investigation clinic on timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathway for Lung Cancer Detection: Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Incidental pulmonary nodule management in Canada: exploring current state through a narrative literature review and expert interviews.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Plasma-derived exosomal immunoglobulins IGHV4-4 and IGLV1-40 as new non-small cell lung cancer biomarkers.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Article
- A Pilot Study of Radiomics Models Combining Multi-Probe and Multi-Modality Images ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Interventions to improve early cancer diagnosis of symptomatic individuals: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Lung Cancer Pre-Diagnostic Pathways from First Presentation to Specialist Referral.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- An Audit of CT Chest Reports and Their Potential Impact on the Workup of Patients with Suspected Lung Cancer.Canadian respiratory journal · 2021Article
- Impact of Timeliness of Surgical Treatment on the Outcomes of Patients with Non-metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From the PLCO Trial.World journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Predicting delays in lung cancer diagnosis and staging.Thoracic cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines recommend timely evaluation of patients with suspected lung cancer. We evaluated the impact of a Rapid Investigation Clinic (RIC) on timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment between February 2010 and December 2011.
methodsInvestigation within the RIC was conducted by a pulmonologist and a nurse clinician. Controls were patients with lung cancer, investigated outside the RIC at the same institution during the same time period. The primary outcome was time between first contact with a local physician for suspected lung cancer (T0) and first treatment. Factors associated with the delay from T0 to first treatment were examined using multivariate analysis. Completeness of lung cancer staging according to guidelines was assessed.
resultsA total of 195 patients were investigated within the RIC vs. 132 patients outside the RIC. The median delay between T0 and first treatment was 65 days (interquartile range [IQR] 46-92 days) in the RIC and 78 days (IQR 49-119 days) in the non-RIC patients (p ≤ 0.01). Time from T0 to pathological diagnosis was shorter in the RIC (median 26 days; IQR 14-42 days) vs. non-RIC patients (median 40 days; IQR 16-68 days). In multivariate analysis, investigation in the RIC was associated with a reduction in time to first treatment of 24 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 12-35 days) when adjusted for relevant confounders. Guideline-concordant investigation occurred more frequently in RIC patients, based on the quality indicators examined.
conclusionsA Rapid Investigation Clinic reduces delays to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, and impacts quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.