Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29216831›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2017

Validity of mobile electronic data capture in clinical studies: a pilot study in a pediatric population.

Belinda von Niederhäusern, Ramon Saccilotto, Sabine Schädelin, Victoria Ziesenitz, Pascal Benkert, Marie-Luise Decker, Anya Hammann, Julia Bielicki, Marc Pfister, Christiane Pauli-Magnus

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Belinda von NiederhäusernClinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. belinda.vonniederhausern@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0287-8189
Ramon SaccilottoDepartment of Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Sabine SchädelinClinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Victoria ZiesenitzDivision of Paediatric Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, University of Basel Children's Hospital, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Pascal BenkertClinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Marie-Luise DeckerDivision of Paediatric Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, University of Basel Children's Hospital, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Anya HammannClinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Julia BielickiDivision of Paediatric Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, University of Basel Children's Hospital, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Marc PfisterDivision of Paediatric Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, University of Basel Children's Hospital, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Christiane Pauli-MagnusClinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical studies in children are necessary yet conducting multiple visits at study centers remains challenging. The success of "care-at-home" initiatives and remote clinical trials suggests their potential to facilitate conduct of pediatric studies. This pilot aimed to study the feasibility of remotely collecting valid (i.e. complete and correct) saliva samples and clinical data utilizing mobile technology.

methodsSingle-center, prospective pilot study in children undergoing elective tonsillectomy at the University of Basel Children's Hospital. Data on pain scores and concomitant medication and saliva samples were collected by caregivers on two to four inpatient study days and on three consecutive study days at home. A tailored mobile application developed for this study supported data collection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of complete and correct caregiver-collected data (pain scale) and saliva samples in the at-home setting. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of complete and correct saliva samples in the inpatient setting, subjective feasibility for caregivers, and study cost.

resultsA total number of 23 children were included in the study of which 17 children, median age 6.0 years (IQR 5.0, 7.4), completed the study. During the at-home phase, 71.9% [CI = 64.4, 78.6] of all caregiver-collected pain assessments and 53.9% [CI = 44.2, 63.4] of all saliva samples were complete and correct. Overall, 64.7% [CI = 58.7, 70.4] of all data collected by caregivers at home was complete and correct. The predominant reason for incorrectness of data was adherence to the timing of predefined patient actions. Participating caregivers reported high levels of satisfaction and willingness to participate in similar trials in the future. Study costs for a potential sample size of 100 patients were calculated to be 20% lower for the at-home than for a traditional in-patient study setting.

conclusionsMobile device supported studies conducted at home may provide a cost-effective approach to facilitate conduct of clinical studies in children. Given findings in this pilot study, data collection at home may focus on electronic data capture rather than biological sampling.

Indexed as

AftercareChildChild, PreschoolData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsPilot ProjectsTonsillectomyTonsillitisTreatment OutcomeData qualityData validityFeasibilityMobile studiesPediatricsRemote studies

Identifiers

PMID29216831
PMCPMC5721383
OpenAlexW2774055300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.