Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29216596›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2018

Understanding social and behavioral drivers and impacts of air quality sensor use.

Bryan J Hubbell, Amanda Kaufman, Louie Rivers, Kayla Schulte, Gayle Hagler, Jane Clougherty, Wayne Cascio, Dan Costa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Addressing systemic problems with exposure assessments to protect the public's health.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Harmonization and Visualization of Data from a Transnational Multi-Sensor Personal Exposure Campaign.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Can Air Quality Citizen-Sensors Turn into Clean Air Ambassadors? Insights from a Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  15. On the distribution of low-cost PMJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Community-Engaged Air Monitoring to Build Resilience Near the US-Mexico Border.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Youth Engaged Participatory Air Monitoring: A 'Day in the Life' in Urban Environmental Justice Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bryan J HubbellU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: hubbell.bryan@epa.gov.
Amanda KaufmanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: kaufman.amanda@epa.gov.
Louie RiversNorth Carolina State University, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Campus Box 8001, Raleigh, NC 27695-8001, USA. Electronic address: lrivers@ncsu.edu.
Kayla SchulteUniversity of Oxford, Department of Geography and the Environment, S Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
Gayle HaglerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: hagler.gayle@epa.gov.
Jane CloughertyDrexel University, Dornsife School of Public Health, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: jec373@drexel.edu.
Wayne CascioU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: cascio.wayne@epa.gov.
Dan CostaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: costa.dan@epa.gov.
Environmental Protection Agency · USDrexel University · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLower-cost air quality sensors (hundreds to thousands of dollars) are now available to individuals and communities. This technology is undergoing a rapid and fragmented evolution, resulting in sensors that have uncertain data quality, measure different air pollutants and possess a variety of design attributes. Why and how individuals and communities choose to use sensors is arguably influenced by social context. For example, community experiences with environmental exposures and health effects and related interactions with industry and government can affect trust in traditional air quality monitoring. To date, little social science research has been conducted to evaluate why or how sensors, and sensor data, are used by individuals and communities, or how the introduction of sensors changes the relationship between communities and air quality managers.

objectivesThis commentary uses a risk governance/responsible innovation framework to identify opportunities for interdisciplinary research that brings together social scientists with air quality researchers involved in developing, testing, and deploying sensors in communities. DISCUSSION: Potential areas for social science research include communities of sensor users; drivers for use of sensors and sensor data; behavioral, socio-political, and ethical implications of introducing sensors into communities; assessing methods for communicating sensor data; and harnessing crowdsourcing capabilities to analyze sensor data.

conclusionsSocial sciences can enhance understanding of perceptions, attitudes, behaviors, and other human factors that drive levels of engagement with and trust in different types of air quality data. New transdisciplinary research bridging social sciences, natural sciences, engineering, and design fields of study, and involving citizen scientists working with professionals from a variety of backgrounds, can increase our understanding of air sensor technology use and its impacts on air quality and public health.

Indexed as

Environmental PolicyAir PollutantsAir PollutionCommunity ParticipationEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHumansPublic HealthSocial SciencesAir PollutantsAir pollutionCitizen scienceExposureMonitoringSocial science

Identifiers

PMID29216596
PMCPMC6705391
OpenAlexW2777868814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.