Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29216340›Full record

ReviewAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Incorporating blood-based liquid biopsy information into cancer staging: time for a TNMB system?

M Yang, M E Forbes, R L Bitting, S S O'Neill, P-C Chou, U Topaloglu, L D Miller, G A Hawkins, S C Grant, B R DeYoung and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Research Progress of TNMB Staging in Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M YangWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
M E ForbesWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
R L BittingWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
S S O'NeillWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
P-C ChouWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
U TopalogluWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
L D MillerWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
G A HawkinsWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
S C GrantWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
B R DeYoungWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
W J PettyWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
K ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China. Electronic address: chenkexin@tjmuch.com.
B C PascheWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA; Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
W ZhangWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA. Electronic address: wezhang@wakehealth.edu.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USWake Forest University · USTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue biopsy is the standard diagnostic procedure for cancer. Biopsy may also provide material for genotyping, which can assist in the diagnosis and selection of targeted therapies but may fall short in cases of inadequate sampling, particularly from highly heterogeneous tumors. Traditional tissue biopsy suffers greater limitations in its prognostic capability over the course of disease, most obviously as an invasive procedure with potential complications, but also with respect to probable tumor clonal evolution and metastasis over time from initial biopsy evaluation. Recent work highlights circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) present in the blood as a supplemental, or perhaps an alternative, source of DNA to identify the clinically relevant cancer mutational landscape. Indeed, this noninvasive approach may facilitate repeated monitoring of disease progression and treatment response, serving as a means to guide targeted therapies based on detected actionable mutations in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Notably, ctDNA is heralding a revolution in the range of genomic profiling and molecular mechanisms to be utilized in the battle against cancer. This review will discuss the biology of ctDNA, current methods of detection and potential applications of this information in tumor diagnosis, treatment, and disease prognosis. Conventional classification of tumors to describe cancer stage follow the TNM notation system, heavily weighting local tumor extent (T), lymph node invasion (N), and detectable metastasis (M). With recent advancements in genomics and bioinformatics, it is conceivable that routine analysis of ctDNA from liquid biopsy (B) may make cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis more accurate for individual patients. We put forward the futuristic concept of TNMB tumor classification, opening a new horizon for precision medicine with the hope of creating better outcomes for cancer patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID29216340
PMCPMC5834142
OpenAlexW2771658956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.