Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29216300›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment.

Jeri Brittin, Leah Frerichs, John R Sirard, Nancy M Wells, Beth M Myers, Jeanette Garcia, Dina Sorensen, Matthew J Trowbridge, Terry Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of structural-level environmental interventions on physical activity: a systematic review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Implementation of Brain BreaksInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physical Activity in 15-17-Year-Old Adolescents as Compensation for Sedentary Behavior in School.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jeri BrittinHDR, Department of Built Environment Research, Omaha, NE, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1316-6451
Leah FrerichsUniversity of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
John R SirardUniversity of Massachusetts-Amherst, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, Amherst, MA, United States of America.
Nancy M WellsCornell University, College of Human Ecology, Department of Design and Environmental Analysis, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Beth M MyersCornell University, College of Human Ecology, Department of Design and Environmental Analysis, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Jeanette GarciaUniversity of Central Florida, College of Education and Human Sciences, Department of Educational and Human Services, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
Dina SorensenVMDO Architects, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Matthew J TrowbridgeUniversity of Virginia, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Terry HuangCity University of New York, School of Public Health, Graduate Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Cornell University · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren spend a significant portion of their days in sedentary behavior (SB) and on average fail to engage in adequate physical activity (PA). The school built environment may influence SB and PA, but research is limited. This natural experiment evaluated whether an elementary school designed to promote movement impacted students' school-time SB and PA.

methodsAccelerometers measured SB and PA at pre and post time-points in an intervention group who moved to the new school (n = 21) and in a comparison group experiencing no school environmental change (n = 20). Difference-in-difference (DD) analysis examined SB and PA outcomes in these groups. Measures were also collected post-intervention from an independent, grade-matched group of students in the new school (n = 21).

resultsAs expected, maturational increases in SB were observed. However, DD analysis estimated that the intervention attenuated increase in SB by 81.2 ± 11.4 minutes/day (p<0.001), controlling for time in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The intervention was also estimated to increase daily number of breaks from SB by 23.4 ± 2.6 (p < .001) and to increase light physical activity (LPA) by 67.7 ± 10.7 minutes/day (p<0.001). However, the intervention decreased MVPA by 10.3 ± 2.3 minutes/day (p<0.001). Results of grade-matched independent samples analysis were similar, with students in the new vs. old school spending 90.5 ± 16.1 fewer minutes/day in SB, taking 21.1 ± 2.7 more breaks from SB (p<0.001), and spending 64.5 ± 14.8 more minutes in LPA (p<0.001), controlling for time in MVPA. Students in the new school spent 13.1 ± 2.7 fewer minutes in MVPA (p<0.001) than their counterparts in the old school.

conclusionsThis pilot study found that active school design had beneficial effects on SB and LPA, but not on MVPA. Mixed results point to a need for active classroom design strategies to mitigate SB, and quick access from classrooms to areas permissive of high-intensity activities to promote MVPA. Integrating active design with programs/policies to promote PA may yield greatest impact on PA of all intensities.

Indexed as

ExerciseSchoolsSedentary BehaviorChildFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsVirginia

Identifiers

PMID29216300
PMCPMC5720751
OpenAlexW2773706440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.