Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29215764›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2018

An evaluation of the challenges to developing tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing methodologies for clinical practice.

Gillian Ellison, Miika Ahdesmäki, Sally Luke, Paul M Waring, Andrew Wallace, Ronnie Wright, Benno Röthlisberger, Katja Ludin, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Carina Heydt and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Laboratory Cross-Comparison and Ring Test Trial for TumorJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. A commentary on the discrepancy between blood and tumour BRCA testing: An open question.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Gillian EllisonPrecision Medicine and Genomics, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
Miika AhdesmäkiTranslational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9091-7773
Sally LukeR&D Information, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Paul M WaringDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew WallaceGenomic Diagnostics Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Ronnie WrightGenomic Diagnostics Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Benno RöthlisbergerKantonsspital Aarau, Institut für Labormedizin, Abteilung für Medizinische Genetik, Aarau, Switzerland.
Katja LudinKantonsspital Aarau, Institut für Labormedizin, Abteilung für Medizinische Genetik, Aarau, Switzerland.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Carina HeydtInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marjolijn J L LigtenbergDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Arjen R MensenkampDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
David Gonzalez de CastroCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Thomas JonesThe Centre for Molecular Pathology, The Royal Marsden NHS FT, Sutton, UK.
Ana VivancosLaboratory 2.01, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Olga KondrashovaDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Patrick PauwelsCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Pathology Department, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
Christine WeynCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Pathology Department, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
Eric HahnenCenter for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jan HaukeCenter for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Richie SoongCancer Science Institute of Singapore, and Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Zhongwu LaiBioscience, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, IMED Oncology, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Brian DoughertyTranslational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts.
T Hedley CarrTranslational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Justin JohnsonTranslational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts.
John MillsPrecision Medicine and Genomics, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
J Carl BarrettTranslational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBAstraZeneca (United States) · USUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEAntwerp University Hospital · BEKantonsspital Aarau · CHRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt Mary's Hospital · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUNational University of Singapore · SGQueen's University Belfast · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer patients with germline or somatic pathogenic variants benefit from treatment with poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Tumor BRCA1/2 testing is more challenging than germline testing as the majority of samples are formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE), the tumor genome is complex, and the allelic fraction of somatic variants can be low. We collaborated with 10 laboratories testing BRCA1/2 in tumors to compare different approaches to identify clinically important variants within FFPE tumor DNA samples. This was not a proficiency study but an inter-laboratory comparison to identify common issues. Each laboratory received the same tumor DNA samples ranging in genotype, quantity, quality, and variant allele frequency (VAF). Each laboratory performed their preferred next-generation sequencing method to report on the variants. No false positive results were reported in this small study and the majority of methods detected the low VAF variants. A number of variants were not detected due to the bioinformatics analysis, variant classification, or insufficient DNA. The use of hybridization capture or short amplicon methods are recommended based on a bioinformatic assessment of the data. The study highlights the importance of establishing standards and standardization for tBRCA testing particularly when the test results dictate clinical decisions regarding life extending therapies.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinComputational BiologyDNA Copy Number VariationsExonsGene FrequencyGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansNeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteindiagnosticFFPENGSPARPtBRCA

Identifiers

PMID29215764
PMCPMC5838520
OpenAlexW2774590220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.