Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29215753›Full record

ArticleCancer science2018

Combined annotation-dependent depletion score for BRCA1/2 variants in patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Hiroshi Nakagomi, Hitoshi Mochizuki, Masayuki Inoue, Yosuke Hirotsu, Kenji Amemiya, Ikuko Sakamoto, Satoko Nakagomi, Takeo Kubota, Masao Omata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic Profiling IdentifiedFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi NakagomiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-4487
Hitoshi MochizukiGenome Analysis Center, Department of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Masayuki InoueDepartment of Breast Surgery, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Yosuke HirotsuGenome Analysis Center, Department of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Kenji AmemiyaGenome Analysis Center, Department of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Ikuko SakamotoDepartment of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Satoko NakagomiGraduate School of Interdisciplinary Research, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Japan.
Takeo KubotaDepartment of Child Studies, Seitoku University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masao OmataGenome Analysis Center, Department of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan.
Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital · JPTokyo Seitoku University · JPUniversity of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utility of combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD) score was recently reported to rank pathogenicity as C-scores ranging 1-99 for both confirmed deleterious mutation. Using C-scores for BRCA1/2 variants, we tried to constitute the classification system for variant of uncertain significance (VUS), which had been a major problem of genetic testing for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. We analyzed BRCA1/2 genes for 283 patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer. The deleterious mutation and missesne mutations, minor variant, and wild type of BRCA1 and -2 were 5, 27, 251 and 15, 85, 183, respectively. Meanwhile, the variants with C-score ≥10 were involved in 19/283 (6.7%) in BRCA1 and 34/283 (12%) in BRCA2. All deleterious mutations were included in this group. Frequency of personal history and family history of ovarian cancer were significantly high, and frequency of serous adenocarcinoma of ovary and triple negative breast cancer was relatively high in the group with deleterious mutations. Similar findings were seen in patients with variants of C-score ≥10. According to the C-score and population frequency, we could define VUS for 11 patients out of 283 patients (3.9 CADD is useful to classify the variant of BRCA1/2 and selecting the patient who needs further segregation studies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedMutation, MissenseOvarian NeoplasmsPedigreeSequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCAcombined annotation-dependent depletiongenetic counselinghereditary breast and/or ovarian cancervariant of uncertain significance

Identifiers

PMID29215753
PMCPMC5797818
OpenAlexW2772433871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.