ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2018
Prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells in patients with ampullary cancer.
Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathologic Analysis and Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Operable Ampullary Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Cell-free DNA as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in resectable distal common bile duct cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023Article
- Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence in ampullary adenocarcinoma patients after curative Whipple's resection: a retrospective cohort study in the National Cancer Center in China.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Article
- Significant diagnostic value of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Design of a microfluidic chip consisting of micropillars and its use for the enrichment of nasopharyngeal cancer cells.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- The Frequency of Circulating Tumour Cells and the Correlation with the Clinical Response to Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Prospective Study.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells in patients with ampullary cancer.Journal of cellular physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are an important topic of investigation for both basic and clinical cancer research. In this prospective study, we evaluated the clinical role of CTCs in ampullary cancer. We analyzed blood samples from 62 consecutively diagnosed patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma and 24 healthy controls for their CTC content. Combined data from immunostaining of CD45, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and fluorescence in situ hybridization with a chromosome 8 centromere (CEP8) probe were used to identify CTCs; cells that were CD45-/DAPI+/CEP8>2 were considered CTCs. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the relationship between CTCs, clinical characteristics, and patient outcomes. We detected ≥2 CTCs/3.2 ml whole blood in 43 of 62 patients (69.4%), as well as ≥5 CTCs/3.2 ml in 16 of these patients (25.8%). A CTC cutoff value of 2 cells/3.2 ml achieved 69.4% sensitivity and 95.8% specificity as a diagnostic tool; CTCs were associated with tumor burden. CTC levels ≥3/3.2 ml (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: (1.2-5.2), p = 0.014) and ≥5/3.2 ml (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.7-7.3, p < 0.001) were both associated with shorter disease-free survival. Moreover, ≥3 CTCs/3.2 ml (HR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2-6.3, p = 0.019) and ≥5 CTCs/3.2 ml (HR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.8-8.5, p < 0.001) were predictive of shorter overall survival. CTC assessment may help identify patients with ampullary cancer who are at high risk of an unfavorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.