Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29215303›Full record

ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2018

Influence of Cryopreservation Solution on the In Vitro Culture of Skin Tissues Derived from Collared Peccary (Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758).

Alana A Borges, Gabriela P O Lira, Lucas E Nascimento, Luiza B Queiroz Neta, Maria V O Santos, Moacir F Oliveira, Alexandre R Silva, Alexsandra F Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biobanking biodiversity: recent strategies, challenges, and opportunities.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Cryopreservation of Testicular Tissue from Adult Red-Rumped Agoutis (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alana A Borges1 Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Gabriela P O Lira1 Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Lucas E Nascimento1 Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Luiza B Queiroz Neta1 Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Maria V O Santos1 Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Moacir F Oliveira2 Laboratory of Applied Animal Morphophysiology, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Alexandre R Silva3 Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Alexsandra F Pereira1 Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid , Mossoró, Brazil .
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin vitrification is a promising and alternative tool for the conservation of biodiversity, especially for wild mammals, such as collared peccaries. Several factors can affect the success of this procedure, such as the cryoprotectant solution used. Therefore, this study was carried out to compare the efficiency of various vitrification solutions for recovery of viable cells after in vitro culture of cryopreserved skin tissues derived from the collared peccary, aiming to study the application in biobanking, where cellular use is not immediately required. Then, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) composed of 2.2 g/L sodium bicarbonate and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) was supplemented with 3.0 M ethylene glycol (EG) or 3.0 M dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or 1.5 M EG plus 1.5 M DMSO with or without sucrose (SUC; 0.25 M) to produce six solutions for solid-surface vitrification. After warming, skin tissues were cultured in vitro and recovered cells were analyzed for morphology, adhesion, subconfluence, and proliferative activity for developing the growth curve and determining the population doubling time (PDT), and viability by Trypan Blue. The vitrification did not alter the ability of the tissues to adhere to the culture dish, as well as the day of all explants with cell growth, subconfluence samples, subconfluence total time, and PDT (p > 0.05). Moreover, independent of the cryoprotectant solution used, the vitrification altered the day of all attached explants (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, for viability after the first passage, only the EG-SUC (86.9%) and DMSO-SUC (91.4%) groups maintained viable cell recovery similar to the nonvitrified group (96.3%, p > 0.05). Additionally, for viability after the third passage, only the EG-SUC group maintained the cell quality (88.3%), when compared with the nonvitrified (97.8%, p > 0.05). In conclusion, DMEM with 10% FBS, 3.0 M EG, and 0.25 M sucrose was the most efficient solution for vitrifying collared peccary skin tissues, leading to the in vitro culture of viable cells.

Indexed as

Cryoprotective AgentsSkinTissue BanksAnimalsArtiodactylaCryopreservationTissue Culture TechniquesCryoprotective Agentscryobankingcryoprotectantssomatic tissueswild mammals

Identifiers

PMID29215303
PMCPMC5906723
OpenAlexW2775003474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.