Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29215092›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human genetics2018

Improvement in the sensitivity of newborn screening for Fabry disease among females through the use of a high-throughput and cost-effective method, DNA mass spectrometry.

Yung-Hsiu Lu, Po-Hsun Huang, Li-Yun Wang, Ting-Rong Hsu, Hsing-Yuan Li, Pi-Chang Lee, Yu-Ping Hsieh, Sheng-Che Hung, Yu-Chen Wang, Sheng-Kai Chang and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Newborn Screening for Fabry Disease: Current Status of Knowledge.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023
    Review
  6. How relevant are cerebral white matter lesions in the D313Y variant of the α-galactosidase A gene? Neurological, cardiological, laboratory, and MRI data of 21 patients within a follow-up of 3 years.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. PDGF receptor mutations in human diseases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yung-Hsiu LuInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Po-Hsun HuangInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Yun WangTaipei Institute of Pathology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Rong HsuInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsing-Yuan LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pi-Chang LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Ping HsiehDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sheng-Che HungDepartment of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Chen WangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sheng-Kai ChangDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ya-Ting LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ping-Hsun HoDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hui-Chen HoTaipei Institute of Pathology, Taipei, Taiwan. juju5113@gmail.com.
Dau-Ming NiuInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. dmniu1111@yahoo.com.tw.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming University Hospital · TWTaipei Institute of Pathology · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many female carriers of Fabry disease are likely to develop severe morbidity and mortality. However, by our own estimation, around 80% of female newborns are missed by our current enzyme-based screening approach. Our team's aim was to develop an improved cost-effective screening method that is able to detect Fabry disease among female newborns. In Taiwan, based on a database of 916,000 newborns, ~98% of Fabry patients carry mutations out of a pool of only 21 pathogenic mutations. An Agena iPLEX platform was designed to detect these 21 pathogenic mutations using only a single-assay panel. A total of 54,791 female infants were screened and 136 female newborns with the IVS4 + 919G > A mutation and one female newborn with the c.656T > C mutation were identified. Using the current enzyme-based newborn screening approach as baseline, around 83% of female newborns are being missed. Through a family study of the IVS4 female newborns, 30 IVS4 adult family members were found to have left ventricular hypertrophy. Ten patients received endomyocardial biopsy and all were found to have significant globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) accumulation in their cardiomyocytes. All of these individuals now receive enzyme replacement therapy. We have demonstrated that the Agena iPLEX assay is a powerful tool for detecting females with Fabry disease. Furthermore, through this screening, we also have been able to identify many disease-onset adult family members who were originally undiagnosed for Fabry disease. This screening helps them to receive treatment in time before severe and irreversible cardiac damage has occurred.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMass SpectrometryAdultDNAFabry DiseaseFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornSensitivity and SpecificityDNA

Identifiers

PMID29215092
OpenAlexW2770633778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.