Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214851›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2018

Weight and Veterans' Environments Study (WAVES) I and II: Rationale, Methods, and Cohort Characteristics.

Shannon N Zenk, Elizabeth Tarlov, Lisa M Powell, Coady Wing, Stephen A Matthews, Sandy Slater, Howard S Gordon, Michael Berbaum, Marian L Fitzgibbon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shannon N Zenk1 Department of Health Systems Science, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth Tarlov1 Department of Health Systems Science, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lisa M Powell3 Health Policy and Administration Division, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Coady Wing5 Indiana University-Bloomington School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Stephen A Matthews6 Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Demography, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Sandy Slater3 Health Policy and Administration Division, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Howard S Gordon7 Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael Berbaum4 Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marian L Fitzgibbon3 Health Policy and Administration Division, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Environmental Attributes and Weight Control: Study of Over 1.3 Million VeteransR01CA172726 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI TARLOV, ELIZABETH, ZENK, SHANNON N · 2013 to 2016
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present the rationale, methods, and cohort characteristics for 2 complementary "big data" studies of residential environment contributions to body weight, metabolic risk, and weight management program participation and effectiveness.

designRetrospective cohort.

settingContinental United States.

participantsA total of 3 261 115 veterans who received Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care in 2009 to 2014, including 169 910 weight management program participants and a propensity score-derived comparison group.

interventionThe VA MOVE! weight management program, an evidence-based lifestyle intervention. MEASURES: Body mass index, metabolic risk measures, and MOVE! participation; residential environmental attributes (eg, food outlet availability and walkability); and MOVE! program characteristics. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics presented on cohort characteristics and environments where they live.

resultsForty-four percent of men and 42.8% of women were obese, whereas 4.9% of men and 9.9% of women engaged in MOVE!. About half of the cohort had at least 1 supermarket within 1 mile of their home, whereas they averaged close to 4 convenience stores (3.6 for men, 3.9 for women) and 8 fast-food restaurants (7.9 for men, 8.2 for women). Forty-one percent of men and 38.6% of women did not have a park, and 35.5% of men and 31.3% of women did not have a commercial fitness facility within 1 mile.

conclusionDrawing on a large nationwide cohort residing in diverse environments, these studies are poised to significantly inform policy and weight management program design.

Indexed as

VeteransAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Mass IndexBody WeightDietExerciseFemaleFood SupplyHealth PromotionHumansLife StyleBlood GlucoseLipidsbuilt environmentfood environmenthealth status disparitiesneighborhoodobesityweight loss

Identifiers

PMID29214851
PMCPMC5876028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.