Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214778›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2018

Supplementary Diagnostic Landmarks of Left Ventricular Non-Compaction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Marko Boban, Vladimir Pesa, Natko Beck, Sime Manola, Marinko Zulj, Ante Rotim, Aleksandar Vcev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of acquired and non-structural pediatric heart disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marko BobanDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital "Thalassotherapia Opatija," Medical Faculty University of Rijeka, Opatija, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-575X
Vladimir PesaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital "Thalassotherapia Opatija," Medical Faculty University of Rijeka, Opatija, Croatia.
Natko BeckDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital "Thalassotherapia Opatija," Medical Faculty University of Rijeka, Opatija, Croatia.
Sime ManolaDepartment of Cardiology-Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology, University Hospital "Sestre Milosrdnice," Zagreb, Croatia.
Marinko ZuljDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty "J.J. Strossmayer" University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.
Ante RotimDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital "Thalassotherapia Opatija," Medical Faculty University of Rijeka, Opatija, Croatia.
Aleksandar VcevDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty "J.J. Strossmayer" University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiagnostic criteria for left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) are still a matter of dispute. The aim of our present study was to test the diagnostic value of two novel diagnostic cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters: proof of non-compact (NC) myocardium blood flow using T2 sequences and changes in geometry of the left ventricle. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included cases with LVNC and controls, from a data base formed in a period of 3.5 years (n=1890 exams), in which CMR protocol included T2 sequences. Measurement of perpendicular maximal and minimal end diastolic dimensions in the region with NC myocardium from short axis plane was recorded, and calculated as a ratio (MaxMinEDDR), while flow through trabecula was proven by intracavital T2-weighted hyperintensity (ICT2HI). LVNC diagnosis met the following three criteria: thickening of compact (C) layer, NC:C>2.3:1 and NC>20%LV.

resultsThe study included 200 patients; 71 with LVNC (35.5%; i.e., 3.76% of CMRs) and 129 (64.5%) controls. MaxMinEDDR in patients with LVNC was significantly different from that in controls (1.17±0.08 vs. 1.06±0.04, respectively; p<0.001). MaxMinEDDR >1.10 had sensitivity of 91.6% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 82.5-96.8], specificity of 85.3% (95% CI 78.0-90.0), and area under curve (AUC) 0.919 (95% CI 0.872-0.953; p<0.001) for LVNC. Existence of ICT2HI had sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI 94.9-100.0), specificity of 91.5% (95% CI 85.3-95.7), and AUC 0.957 (95% CI 0.919-0.981; p<0.001) for LVNC.

conclusionTwo additional diagnostic parameters for LVNC were identified in this study. ICT2HI and geometric eccentricity of the ventricle both had relatively high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing LVNC.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveCase-Control StudiesFemaleGadoliniumHeart VentriclesHumansIsolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular MyocardiumMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveYoung AdultGadoliniumcardiac magnetic resonance imagingdiagnostic criteriaLeft ventricle non-compactionmaximal to minimal end diastolic diameters ratioT2-sequences

Identifiers

PMID29214778
PMCPMC5725366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.