Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214679›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2018

The relationship between negative metacognitive thoughts, pain catastrophizing and adjustment to chronic pain.

M S Ziadni, J A Sturgeon, B D Darnall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Virtual embodiment in fibromyalgia.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M S ZiadniDivision of Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J A SturgeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
B D DarnallDivision of Pain Medicine, Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training in Pain and Substance Use DisordersT32DA035165 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SEAN C MACKEY · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
Single Session Pain Catastrophizing Treatment: Comparative Efficacy & MechanismsR01AT008561 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DARNALL, BETH DENISE, MACKEY, SEAN C · 2015 to 2019
$3.9M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008561NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA035165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive appraisals, most notably pain catastrophizing, play an important role in chronic pain. The role of metacognition and its impact on the relationship between pain catastrophizing and health are understudied. The identification of metacognition as a moderator of psychological constructs may have clinical and empirical implications. We hypothesized that negative metacognitive beliefs would moderate the relationships between pain catastrophizing and emotional functioning and physical activity.

methodParticipants (N = 211) with mixed aetiology chronic pain were primarily Caucasian females with severe average pain intensity. Over the course of 2 weeks, participants completed online daily-diary measures of pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, mood, physical activity and metacognition.

resultsParticipants with higher average levels of daily pain intensity and negative metacognitive beliefs about worry reported higher levels of daily pain catastrophizing, as well as daily depression, and anxiety. Some aspects of metacognitive beliefs (i.e. dangerousness and uncontrollability of thoughts) were also negatively associated with average daily levels of positive affect. However, these effects were not interactive; metacognitive beliefs did not moderate the relationships of pain catastrophizing with other daily variables.

conclusionsFrom a daily coping perspective, findings reveal that people with stronger negative metacognitive beliefs report greater emotional distress on a day-to-day basis. However, negative metacognitive beliefs did not appear to modify the effects of pain catastrophizing on psychological and physical functioning at the daily level, suggesting that metacognitive beliefs may be better conceptualized as a more parallel indicator of emotional maladjustment to chronic pain whose effects do not reliably manifest in daily measurement models. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings highlight the need to better characterize the value of metacognitive beliefs as an important predictor and therapeutic target. Despite limited evidence of a dynamic relationship between metacognition and daily adjustment to chronic pain, results emphasize the potential importance of interventions that target cognitive appraisal process beyond catastrophizing, including uncontrollability and danger-laden thought patterns.

Indexed as

MetacognitionAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyCatastrophizationChronic PainDepressionEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID29214679
PMCPMC5854507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.