ArticlePituitary2018
Bone histomorphometry in acromegaly patients with fragility vertebral fractures.
Article in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences between bone health parameters in adults with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency: A systematic review.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2023Pooled it
- Osteometabolic complications in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas: Is there an impact of gender?Pituitary · 2026Review
- Neuroendocrine and neural control of bone mass in health and disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Association between vertebral fracture risk and bone mineral density in patients with acromegaly.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Osteoporosis and fragility fractures in patients with acromegaly: A two-center cross-sectional study.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Acromegaly treatment and bone: a bidirectional relationship.Pituitary · 2025Review
- Bone scintigraphy pattern in a patient diagnosed with acromegaly.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Comprehensive assessment of primary and secondary low bone mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and cone beam CT-a cross-sectional study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Article
- Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry-A Novel Tool in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Prediction of Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Novel approach to bone comorbidity in resistant acromegaly.Pituitary · 2024Review
- Review
- DXA-derived lumbar bone strain index corrected for kyphosis is associated with vertebral fractures and trabecular bone score in acromegaly.Endocrine · 2024Article
- The direct impact of pegvisomant on osteoblast functions and bone development.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Article
- Ten tips on how to assess bone health in patients with chronic kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Sclerostin and OPG/RANK-L system take part in bone remodeling in patients with acromegaly.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Association of trabecular bone score corrected for tissue thickness with glucose metabolism in acromegaly.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Increased Risk of Hip Fracture in Patients with Acromegaly: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Endocortical Trabecularization in Acromegaly: The Cause for the Paradoxically Increased Vertebral Fracture Risk?JBMR plus · 2023Article
- Acromegaly and the long-term fracture risk of the vertebra and hip: a national cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023Article
- Skeletal complications in acromegaly.Reumatologia · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe high risk of vertebral fractures (VFs) in acromegaly patients despite normal bone mineral density (BMD) is well known. The reasons for this paradoxical finding of skeleton fragility are poorly understood due to the limited data on bone histomorphometry in acromegaly.
objectiveThis study aimed to analyze histomorphometric parameters including bone microarchitecture in acromegaly patients with VFs and normal BMD compared to normal subjects, and also to evaluate the differences between active and controlled acromegaly patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsForty-seven acromegaly patients (17 active, 30 controlled), median (range) age 57 years (30-88) were evaluated for bone turnover, morphometric VFs and BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine and hip; 12 patients with VFs and normal BMD underwent iliac crest bone biopsy; 12 biopsies were taken at the autopsy in healthy sex and age-matched control subjects.
resultsThe histomorphometric evaluation of acromegaly fractured patients was compared with that of normal controls and showed significantly reduced median (range) levels of bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV: 15.37% (7.93-26.75) vs. 18.61% (11.75-27.31), p = 0.036), trabecular thickness (TbTh: 77.6 µm (61.7-88.3) vs. 82.7 µm (72.3-92.0) p = 0.045), with increased trabecular separation (TbSp: 536.4 µm (356.2-900.6) vs. 370.3 µm (377.1-546.3) p = 0.038) and increased cortical thickness (1268 μm (752-2521) vs. 1065 μm (851-1205) p = 0.025) and porosity (11.9% (10.2-13.3) vs. 4.8% (1.6-8.8) p = 0.0008). While active acromegaly patients showed histomophometric features of increased bone turnover, patients with controlled disease presented normal bone turnover with significantly lower osteoblastic activity, expressed as osteoblast number (p = 0.001), active osteoblasts and vigor (p = 0.014) in the presence of reduced osteocyte number (p = 0.008) compared to active disease.
conclusionsThe apparent paradox of bone fragility in acromegaly patients with a normal BMD can be explained by increased cortical thickness and porosity and reduced trabecular thickness with increased trabecular separation. These structural and microarchitectural abnormalities persist in the controlled phase of acromegaly despite bone turnover normalization. The main determinant of bone disease after hormonal control is severe osteoblastic dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.