Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214473›Full record

ArticleOecologia2018

Plants learn and remember: lets get used to it.

Monica Gagliano, Charles I Abramson, Martial Depczynski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Adaptive behaviour and learning in slime moulds: the role of oscillations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Plants are intelligent, here's how.Annals of botany · 2020
    Article
  13. To learn, to remember, to forget-How smart is the gut?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The brain: a concept in flux.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The botanical multiverse of Peter Barlow.Communicative & integrative biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica GaglianoSchool of Biological Science, Centre for Evolutionary Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. monica.gagliano@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2414-6990
Charles I AbramsonLaboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology, Department of Psychology and Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Martial DepczynskiAIMS, The Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.