ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2017
Large-scale DNA organization is a prognostic marker of breast cancer survival.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. We investigated whether changes in large-scale DNA organization (LDO) of tumor epithelial nuclei are an indicator of the aggressiveness of the tumor. We tested our algorithm on a set of 172 duplicates TMA cores samples coming from 95 breast cancer patients. Thirty-five patients died of breast cancer, and 60 were still alive 10 years after surgery. Duplicates cores were used to create training and test set. The TMA slides were stained with Feulgen-thionin and imaged using our in-house high-resolution Imaging system. Automated segmentation of cell nuclei followed by manual selection of intact, in-focus nuclei resulted in an average of 50 cell nuclei per sample available for analysis. Using forward stepwise linear discriminant analysis, a combination of six features that combined linearly gave the best discrimination between the two groups of cells: cells collected from 'deceased' patients TMA specimens and cells collected from "survivors" patients TMA specimens. Five of these features measure the spatial organization of DNA chromatin. The resulting canonical score is named cell LDO score. A patient LDO score, percentage of cell nuclei with a cell LDO score higher than a predefined cutoff value, was processed for the specimens in the test set, and a cutoff value was defined to classify patients with a low or a high LDO score. Using this binary test, 82.1% of patients were correctly classified are "deceased" or "survivors," with a specificity of 79% and a sensitivity of 88%. The relative risk of death of an individual with a high LDO score was nine times higher than for a patient with a low LDO score. When testing the combination of LDO score, node status, histological grade, and tumor grade to predict breast cancer survival, LDO was the most significant predictor. LDO classification was also highly associated with survival for only grade 1 and 2 patients as well as for only grade 3 patients. Our result confirms the potential of LDO to measure phenotypic changes associated with more aggressive disease and could be evaluated to identify patients more likely to benefit from adjuvant therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29214466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.