Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214421›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2018

Interpreting Activation Mapping of Atrial Fibrillation: A Hybrid Computational/Physiological Study.

Francisco Sahli Costabal, Junaid A B Zaman, Ellen Kuhl, Sanjiv M Narayan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03549806 (Stanford Cardiac Invasive Electrophysiology Novel Computer Experience), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03549806 completednot on this map

Stanford Cardiac Invasive Electrophysiology Novel Computer Experience (SCIENCE)

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled11ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation, Atrial Tachycardia, Atrial Flutter, Arrhythmias, CardiacArmsNo Intervention. Test is computer algorithm.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco Sahli CostabalStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2612-463X
Junaid A B ZamanStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ellen KuhlStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. ekuhl@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6283-935X
Sanjiv M NarayanStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

The Dynamics of Human Atrial FibrillationR01HL083359 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
The Maintenance of Human Atrial FibrillationK24HL103800 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
British Heart Foundation FS/14/46/30907Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01 HL83359NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL103800NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083359NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578NIH HHS K24 HL8103800NIH HHS U01 HL119578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most common rhythm disorder of the heart associated with a rapid and irregular beating of the upper chambers. Activation mapping remains the gold standard to diagnose and interpret atrial fibrillation. However, fibrillatory activation maps are highly sensitive to far-field effects, and often disagree with other optical mapping modalities. Here we show that computational modeling can identify spurious non-local components of atrial fibrillation electrograms and improve activation mapping. We motivate our approach with a cohort of patients with potential drivers of persistent atrial fibrillation. In a computational study using a monodomain Maleckar model, we demonstrate that in organized rhythms, electrograms successfully track local activation, whereas in atrial fibrillation, electrograms are sensitive to spiral wave distance and number, spiral tip trajectories, and effects of fibrosis. In a clinical study, we analyzed n = 15 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation that was terminated by limited ablation. In five cases, traditional activation maps revealed a spiral wave at sites of termination; in ten cases, electrogram timings were ambiguous and activation maps showed incomplete reentry. By adjusting electrogram timing through computational modeling, we found rotational activation, which was undetectable with conventional methods. Our results demonstrate that computational modeling can identify non-local deflections to improve activation mapping and explain how and where ablation can terminate persistent atrial fibrillation. Our hybrid computational/physiological approach has the potential to optimize map-guided ablation and improve ablation therapy in atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyModels, CardiovascularSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAgedAtrial FibrillationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAtrial fibrillationElectrogramElectrophysiologyRotorsSimulationSpiral waves

Identifiers

PMID29214421
PMCPMC5880222
OpenAlexW2773538694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.